PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS
■MANGAONE OIL FIELDS V. WIGER, By. Telegraph-Press Association-Copyright
„,, -, ■■ London, May 9. lho case Mangaone Oil Fields Company versus Herman Wiger, manufacturer, a «ew Zealand appeal-case, has been din missed, with costs.
Jhe notion was brought by the respondent against ■ the appellants, the Jlaugaone Oilfields Co., claiming the value of certain pipes which had bean used in connection with boring for oil. Tho queatioa at issuo was whether tho appellants bad lo pay for pipes which could not be removed, though tho presence of those pipes was necessary to enable other pipes to ba removed, which the appellants wero prepared to pay for,. The Court of Appeal decided that the appellants should pay for nil the pipes. At the Court of Appeal, Sir John Findlay and Mr. H.' Lusk appeared for the ' appellants, and Mr. Skerrett and Mr. G. Samuel lor the respondents. ..'■.'.;■.■
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19160511.2.68.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2768, 11 May 1916, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2768, 11 May 1916, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in