Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS

QUEENSLAND V. AUSTRALIA. By TeleEraDh-Pras Assodauon-Copyrisht , London, April 14. Bofore the Privy Council, in the case Attorney-General of Queensland v. the Attorney-General of Australia, 'a petition for Special leave to appeal, the Lord Chancellor said tlio importance of tho matter had increased' as argument proceeded. At his suggestion, the case has been adjourned to May 4, when tho Attornoy-Gouoral of Queensland will argue at full length, de novo.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19160417.2.58

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2748, 17 April 1916, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
71

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2748, 17 April 1916, Page 9

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2748, 17 April 1916, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert