Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TEACHERS' GRADING SCHEME.

Sir,—Tho Auckland Assistant Masters' Association are evidently under the de'usion that they 'have achieved sometlf tig by their selfish agitation !e the tethers'.grading scheme. Tho sum total t the whole of the turmoil engineered ky the assistant masters is that they b l'e had to be taught by the Minister that teachers in all other districts , knew already by the exercise of their own intelligence. Any reasonably informed teacher knows that no promotion, or transfer scheme, compulsory or otherwise, could-be included in a Dominion classification scheme, 6imply because . promotion or transfer would have to be dealt with:by an alteration of the Edtooation Act. ' In the "New Zealand Herald's", report of the meeting of some Auckland teachers on March 3 we ,find the following:—"The. tone of the meeting . . . was considerably modified by . . . . a letter from the Department, which was viewed as satisfactory and reassuring."'.Mr. G. Barber, the chairman, said: "Tne Department's latest reply seemed to place the teachers In a very satisfactory position." Mr. E. Purdie claimed that "the Department's latest telegram' (letter ?) was a complete : justification of the action taken by 'the assistant masters, for it was wholly favourable to their main contention," and, further, "we are guaranteed that tho new lists were not to be immediately operated on for promotion purposes." . ' Now, sir, all the fears above, said to be laid at rest, were.the creation of tho assistants' imagination, the result of their own gross selfishness, an evidence of their ignorance of . the Education Act. No teachors. in other districts required to be told what the Auckland teachers regard as the triumphant vindication "of their main contention." j They might just as well have got up an agitation which resulted in the "satisfactory and reassuring" statement from the Minister that out-of-work teachers from Germany were really not to be included in the classification lists. However, the assistants had to save their face somehow under tho appearance of a triumph, seeing that their action was repudiated by tho moro sensible Auckland teachers; that they could not secure an endorsement of it

at their own meeting, and that'every, other district in New Zealand is indignant at their attempt to preserve Auckland only for Aucklanders.—l am, etc., A MERE SOUTHERNER. . March 31, 1916.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19160406.2.39.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2739, 6 April 1916, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

TEACHERS' GRADING SCHEME. Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2739, 6 April 1916, Page 6

TEACHERS' GRADING SCHEME. Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2739, 6 April 1916, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert