Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

, kir, A letter from Mr. Blackburne, which appears in your yesterday's issue, In reply to one from me, calls for some notice. As to. the facts he brings forward, they are interesting, and I am quite of his opinion as to our being altogether in the wrong in our dealings with China in those opium wars. °I venture, however, to think that he does not touch the point. .That is to say, where is the proof' that the present dreadful war is a punishment sent by Heaven for our sins? He tells us of some things our English Government did to China, and tells of some wars that followed, and adds, with reference to the Indian Mutiny ( "Can anyone doubt that this was a judgment on our nation?" Sir, I venture to think a good many persons are not at all confident on that poinfe We have heard of such occurrences as thirteen persons sitting down to dinner and of one of their number meeting his death before the year was out. Shall we say, "Can anyone doubt his fate, was due to there having been thirteen'at table?" Or, again, we have heard of a man upsetting the salt at the'table, of his going out, mounting his horse, Being thrown, and being brought home to die. Must we conclude that the disaster was duo to his upsetting the salt? Many people used to think so. Ido not wish to be sarcastic, but I submit, in ail earnestness, that the cases I name aro as much proofs as the matters adduced by Mr. Blackburne. There is alivays a tendency in the human mind, where one event follows another, to think of the first as the cause of the second. No doubt Mr. Blackburne is quite familiar. with the fallacy in logic known as "post hoc ergo propter hoc.® That is to say, the'tendency is so common-that the .words to describe it have become proverbial. If that gentleman has no better proof of tho horrors of the Indian Mutiny being a. punishment for the opium war than that tho one followed the other, I do not think his conclusion will commend itself to tho minds' of thoughtful men—l am, etc., RUSTICUS. Day's Bay, Maroh 1, 1916.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19160302.2.47.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2709, 2 March 1916, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

Untitled Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2709, 2 March 1916, Page 7

Untitled Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2709, 2 March 1916, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert