Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BILL

WHAT. IT COSTS WORKERS TO'STRIKE winFiitis&wvim DETAILSOF THE BIG STRIKE. In Sew Zealand" it costs a tnanvoror .£3O to go on strike,, and: not in one case in five • does: he-* get- the thing he struck for. •These are icwo -very important facts deducible from a valuable set of figures which the Labour Department has; com- .' piled. The compilation covers the period of the last twenty years, and that in, iihat time workmen have lost, (in wages alone) over half a million of money. Indirectly' monetary losses, of course, cannot be shown. The average loss* in wages every year has been £26,500. • The total number of strikes which occurred in the period was 144, forty- , eight of which were trivial affairs. The men were fully successful in twenty-five | of the 144 strikes, the employers were ' successful in eighty-four, and compromises were effected in thirty-two. Altogether (except in trivial strikes) 17,317 men went out, and the average duration of the more important strikes •was thirty-two das's. _ .. : In addition to the instruction' t contained in these figures there is a good deal to be gathered from the information concerning the last strike of Wel--1 tingtion watereiders, and the numerous strikes arising but of that event. Altogether there were 13,731.men on strike at that, time, and some unions re- '' mained out for three months. :■ The Blackball miners who were .out longer than any other body, lost about £15,000 in wages, which meant between £40 and £50 to each man of them. The Bunanga miners made about the same individual loss, and the Seddonville miners lost £50 each. ..- . ■ . , The Wellington unionists who 1 struck I lost over £50,000 in wages, which represents an average loss.of £15 par Striker. ■ Some lost much more than £15, the Wellington shipwrights, for instance, £40. The whole strike cost, the workers ]£236,000 in wages. ■ Following is a table giving particulars lor the "big general strike. The wages i lost are stated approximately.—

... Wages •No. of Days on lost. Trade. Strikers, strike. . £ •'Auckland bTewere, etc 150 21 900 : Auckland bricklayers 150 21 1,575 carpenters .. 800 21 3,750 miners 474 84 19,600 iHikurangi miners _. 210 56 5,500 .Auckland drivers .... .500 21 3,750 tAuckland cabinetmakers ._ 280 16 1,680 I'Auckland hotel hands 850 23 2,000 Aucklandlabourers 1,000 .23 7,250 .Auckland painters -, 200 14 800 Auckland seamen ..... 400 42 4,000 Auckland timber men 376 ' 11 2,707 Auckland' watersidors 1,000 42 15,000 New Plymouth watersiders 76 53 152 Wellington builders' ■> labourers 310 14 1,600 Wellington drivels -.500 14 2,500 Wellington 6eamen „ 1,000 42 12,000 .Wellington, • ship- • wrights .„ 30 -77 1,200 Wellington watersiders ._ 1,500 63 33,000 Picton watersiders, ... 50 14 65 Nelson seamen ....... 40 42 " 300 Nelson watersides.... 50 56 800 Nelson miners ........ 94 63 3,002 Stockton miners _. 185 63 6,350' Denniston miners- _' 540 63 15,300 Granity miners .„._ 588 63 16,500 Seddonville miners . 80 77 4,000 Westport waieisiders 76 53 2,000 JPaparoa miners ...... ~, 73 79 2,750 Brunher ■ miners ..„_'- 83' 63 2,000 Blackball miners ..„ 354 91 15,000 Runanga miners 347 81 15,000 •Greymouth watetsid- / ..._...>..„.— 200 47 2,750 .'Christetmrch. drivers' 60 28 '576 iXyttelton-watersiders. ■ 450 63 20,250 :Oamara watersiders 75 42 280 Dunedin watersidera 500 42 7,875 Nightcaps miners ... 80 58 , 2,740 Totals. —__. 13,731 — 236,602

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150211.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2382, 11 February 1915, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
529

THE BILL Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2382, 11 February 1915, Page 9

THE BILL Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2382, 11 February 1915, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert