ZINC CONTRACT WITH ENEMY FIRM
COURT OF APPEAL DECISION. (Rec. December 9, 0.20 a.m.) London, December 8. The Court of Appeal, differing from Mr. Justice Sargent's judgment in the Zino Corporation case, decided that an aotion did not lio, because Hirsch and Sohn were not represented.' • Tho Zino Corporation 60Ught a decision as to whether its contract to sell tho whole of its outpcft to the German firm of Aaron Hirsch and Sohn until 1919 was voided by the war or merely suspended. Mr.. Justice Sargent held that the case was covered by the olause suspending the contract during the continuance of events beyond tne ; control of the vendors or' buyers and which prevented or delayed the carrying out of tho agreement. He granted an injunction restraining the directors from acting on the assumption that the contract had terminated, and added that it was undoubtedly a case.that should go to tho highest tribunal. ■ J
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19141209.2.60
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2328, 9 December 1914, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
154ZINC CONTRACT WITH ENEMY FIRM Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2328, 9 December 1914, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in