Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CITY PROPERTY VALUES

OBJECTIONS HEARD IN ASSESSMENT COURT.

When the Assessment Court resumed yesterday, it was announced that a conference had taken place between the objectors in tdie business area and the valuers, and that, after the discussion had endured for an hour and a half, the objectors' representative had decided not to, proceed any further with at least fifty of.the cases. It was said, also, that tiiere would be no alteration at all in the unimproved valuations, but that in one or two cases Mr. P.,N..Martin (State Valuer) was to make a further inspection. of improvements and that both eets of parties would abide by "his decision.

OTHER OBJECTIONS. The Court then ■ proceeded to hear an objection by J. E. Miles to the valuation of £4000 placed on'his property (part section 116) in Upper Willis Street. Mr. T.. Neave represented the objector. After hearing evidence the Court reduced the capital value to £3868.

Mr. Miles objected also to the capital valuation of £1220 on lot 1, section 358,\Austin Street,'but the Court sustained the assessment. This decision governed two other objections concerning Austin Street property, and ■ the objector (Mr. Miles) withdrew the cases.

The same party proceeded with an objection against the valuation placed upon a property of his in Brougham Drive. The State officers sot its capital value down at £3074. In this instance the objector desired the unimproved valuation reduced and the valuation on the improvements correspondingly increased.

The case was partly heard, when the jDourt adjouTned till Friday nest.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19141006.2.85

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2273, 6 October 1914, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
252

CITY PROPERTY VALUES Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2273, 6 October 1914, Page 9

CITY PROPERTY VALUES Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2273, 6 October 1914, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert