Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

ALLEGED BEEACH OF CONTRACT. In tlte Supreme Court yesterday morning, His Honour Mr. Justice Hosting delivered reserved judgment on an interlocutory motion for au injunction to restrain a hotel licensee from coihmitting an alleged breach of contract. Tho parties to the actioilj were: Alfred Maurice Lewis, of Thomson, Lewis, and Co., aerated water manufacturers, of Wellington, plaintiff, and Horace Ernest Somerville, • licensee of tho Albion Hotel, Wauganui, defendant. Mr. C. B. Morison. K.C., appeared for Lewis, while Mr. T. Young appeared for Somerville. ' . "

Plaintiff (Lewis) claimed that, in consideration of his having advanced the sum of £50 to tho defendant (Somerville) at 7 per cent, interest, the.defendant had agreed to purchase aerated waters from plaintiff's firm aiid from no other firm, for a period of twelve mouths. An injunction was sought.to restrain defondant from going' outside this agreement. The motion was opposed by the defendant (Somerville), who, it was -said, had offered to. repay tho money. Counsel for the defendant contended that the agreement was unreasonable, and in restraint of trade, and was therefore not binding.; In dismissing the motion, Hfs Honour expressed the opinion that it would be better'if a decision on the question were until the trial of thS main action in Waiiganui. He thought that the circumstances were not sufficient to establish'; that' -the cheaperprices charged by the rival manufacturers were unreasonable. On the other hand, the statement that Lewis's prices were reasonable, was outweighed by tho fact that the other firms not only charged less, but conceded better terms. I The motion for the interlocutory injunction would therefore be dismissed with costs and disbursements ■to'■ be costs in the. cause. • TIMARU SESSIONS. A LIGHT CALENDAR. (By Telegraph—Press Association.) Timaru, August 31. ■ The Supreme Court sessions opened to-day before vMr. Justice Denniston.' There were only two oriminal cases. Tho Grand Jury threw out the bill against a young mail who was charged with manslaughter as' the result of a fight between two young fellows at $ country dance. One fell and died in a few minutes. The medical evidence showed that the deceased had an unusually thin skull. ' In the other case James Doun was found guilty of the theft of about £23 from tho To Kapo Hotel. This being his first offence a light sentence of four' months was imposed.

In divorce, Harriet E, Harkin was granted a dissolution of her marriage with J. Harkin, a carpenter, on. tho grounds of desertion. Tho parties-were married in 1902 ? and had sinco lived iu Auckland, Gisborne, and Christchurch. Tho respondent left his homo, in Christchiirch. in 1908, and had hover, since contributed to his wife's support.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140901.2.42.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2243, 1 September 1914, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
439

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2243, 1 September 1914, Page 9

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2243, 1 September 1914, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert