Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAND SETTLEMENT

I, pPORTIONAL' REPRESENTATION I ? AND EFFECTIVE VOTING j \ HON. F. M. B. FISHER ON ELECTORAL I REFORM

j . THE COUNCIL

i The Legislative Counotl met at 2.30. f pm. , I >. over-Insurance and Flro Risks, I Tho Hon J. DUTHIE asked the ! Minister ■ of--Internal Affairs i- (1) [ ■ - Whether the grave danger which exists [;■: .throughout *New"Zealand' from: fire; risk I throi/gh over-insurance/ and with its ac- ■ companying excess, rates of premium, ' • has received the consideration of. the I'■! Government ;'and, if so, do Ministers pro- [ : poso to' deal with tliOi question this scs-. jy. sion? tho -system of-:co-i insurance', recommended in Volume 14 of j -the, latesti'lEncjclopaedia- Britannica," > K' "and which' is. widely resorted to in tho t United^StateLyJVance, and-.Germany, i has'' llads'itheir consideration i (3) i • iWhetherrth© .New Zealand State liisutl ance Department, after its ■ ten years' I experience,:.is.now able to devise a tariff i for risks calculated to meet the equities ! . and'to:command general confidence? |- -AnUnenviable Position. pIn an-<accompanymgM note the. : Hon. f ' Mr. Dutlne' quoted tho New Zealand : State Insurance .Department' for i 1913, as* follows(1) This Dominion- [ i is in the'unenviable position of having |v to shoulder'per capita probably . tho [ largest.'consumption of wealth by fire of t any cmh«ed to-day. The ! States - of America is,, however,i a closo icomiietitbr.i'v.A .loss .of, over half; a. million, sterling is a serious matter i for so'young a country with so small a. peculation. Wealth consumed by fire ' - is a national loss; * Although calls may i be readily met by 'insurance: offices, it (■ muse riot be overlooked that in turn, ■ the.insuring public are taxed,'by way ofi> insurance premiums-.m >.ratio ;to the, ' losses vincurred.' • - Whilst ; losses rjonuun ! ■ high the premiums' paid must bo ;relatively'high. The total firo losses over ■ a period of ten years probably exceed. :- £6,000,000. .The. question which-natur-i ally arises is, 'How can this huge loss ' /'be minimised?' (2) Over-insurance as, i in my opinion; one of the-chief factors in causing tho present loss ratio. It j could bp largely prevented if, jomt ac- ! tion v,'ere taken by all tho insurance ; offices, i The office winch now. declines i . to insure "up to the full value, or to ; over-insure, loses the business to some :■ other - office with more elastic regula- : tions. I can unhesitatingly state that ; k- at the present moment thero are many i . hundreds-of.-policies ourront m'the Dominion which 1 cover "property for; more - i than the. value, ■-and. Vihich-afford' a s > etrongiiricentive.to incendiarism. Over. 1 . insurance is,; of course, not confined to i New Zealand';-it is now attracting some. ! attention in .'the Umted States, which countrsis running Now Zealand cldsaly ( r for thSXdoubtful Lonout of-'having-tho, 'ratio -in the world; and [ ' until tlie. insurance offices" associate"'!*) fight the evil .whole-heartedly and honi estly, many thousands of pounds will '' . continue* to bo sacrificed yearly. Pur- !; ther,V:!The and Insurance j - Record,?-- a recognised monthly journal, published - in these interests m Mel-bourne,-in its-twelve issues to June-last; loports the ocourrence in Newj2ealand i of 1471Mres,; which is an average enor- , mously„m excess of fires reporteamth© States', of Australia." " : . i '•■■■ » Mfnlster's Reply. , , ;va The, Hon. H; D. BELL replied' that i the issues raised /bad been under, tho.

i\ consideration/of the Government i,<f6r'.| [/ some time. It was. hoped. th'at/.tt .ithe-I ! 'near future' .steps would: be.ftaken* to: !:. minimise' tho.. enormousV firo. losses in- 1 ' curred: in New Zealand upon'the lines ' / "suggested. by; tho honourable:, member, ' The 'Mr. Buthie '.said that" lie [■.... got a similar ■a.nOTorlaGtyraiv Ho had> i nopedi'for something;, more/definite in !. tho i reply. Ho ... would probably give notice 1 of motion on the-mattbr/to allow U. it to be ;more fully debated/Slt' jrae a I' matterVof considerable:.:importance "to li the'community, and '/thought Hhat it , was his duty to give/ notice.'of;'motion • on it. . ;■■•':■ -i■/'. ! ; j • Suburbs Excluded;:! ; ' Tho: Hon. J. DUTHIE askeil 'tho. i... Minister ;Tvhy. in tlie publication ,o.f; sta- ; i - tistics the pbpulatioii' therborbiigtls ' .:-of I'etone and Lower Hutt,wereinbt;iiii eluded with the City of .Wellington 'as a' « part of: its suburbs. He pointed out I- that those boroughs i had over~ been i / closely' allied . and identified with Weli lingtori.They: were its main residential i and industrial suburbs, and combinedjin' : their relations'- all that was understood!

i bv suburban... .The omission, if on the i plea of 'distanco, was frivolous, _asTalsb ; . i mischievous, ,since a misconceptipn/was 1 .bo raised wliicty detracted' from the im-. : portanco of the capital arid th'e middlb ' ' districtiof New Zealand. .'. " • Tho Hiii. H. D. BELL, in reply, said,r that when the matter was gone into last ■' census: it was decided ithat"; suburban' : areas for tho four chief cities should !• he contiguous to andvcome%withm,';a; j fwe-milo/'radius of. tho oity&pa%ema¥* • being iii'.character ...•mainly residehtiii!,!' v and tlieir population mainly employed ,in ; i the city:;' Both Hutt and. Petone-were, ; outside the five-mile- radius, and;neithe'r ! was cbhtiguous to'" at \. small rural portion'of Maka'r'a Coilrity r. Intervening. Moreover, in tho case of | Petone, there were self-contained indus- ; tries established' thero,, employing a : large proportion of its population .v Wolf lington had not' been .treated differently" ! in this master to tlie : other : thrce'cities, ] as Onehuriga and' Otahuliu in regard i to Aucklindj and Lyttelton in regard to ;, Christchurch; were excluded from the ' " suburbs o? those cities. Tlie whole question would bo again gono into before tho f next census, .when tho representations i: of the honourable member would bo /• carefully considered. : The Council rose at 2.40 p.m. .-

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140731.2.9.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2216, 31 July 1914, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
892

LAND SETTLEMENT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2216, 31 July 1914, Page 4

LAND SETTLEMENT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2216, 31 July 1914, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert