Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COUNCILLOR HISLOP IN REPLY.

Sir,—'May I avail myself of your columns to refer to a wrong 'impression which appears to have arisen from some remarks of' mine made at the meeting of the City Council held on Thursday last. It is;stated in tlio local columns of this morning's Dominion that Mr.' C. W. Palmer has taken strong exception to' my having referred to the Navy League as a political body organised l'or a political purpose. I certainly - made use of this expression, and I cannot see my way to withdraw it. However, I should like to make it clear- that I did not say and I do not believe that the Navy League is a party organisation. A body organised for the purpose of influencing the policy of the State is undoubtedly a political ■ organisation. When I joined the Navy League, I did 60 .upon the assumption that it was a body organised for the purpose of influencing the British Government, of the day in such a ,way that it would maintain an efficient standard of naval defence. This •is • clearly a political purpose, though not one which divides tho great parties, Conservative and Liberal. It lias, however, its sincere opponents among certain sections of the British people. lam not of this number. Now, sir, to come to tho occasion of my remarks. It wa.s proposed by tho Finance 'Committee of'the council to grant' the use. of the Town Hall at a much .lower price to tho Navy League than:to the Society'for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. The council, as the'trustees of the hall, which is tlio common property of. all; the citizens, must act impartially in letting the hall. Hence I characterised the proposal of the committee to grant, a greater concession to the Navy Leagjuo than to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals as improper. It was a pro-' posal to favour, a body, . a political organisation, a body having in tlie community opponents genuine arid sincere, although-most of us disagree with them, but to refuse a similar,favour to a body in uo sense political, purely benevolent, and universally approved. Moreover tho Society for the Preventjon of Cruelty to Animals is urgently in'need of funds.. The League.with its huge member-' ship is-not, and ought 'not to be. in' need of funds. ; . • I favoured; granting, the same concession to the. Society .for the Prevention of Cruelty to Aninials as' to the Navy League, and "carried my amendment to that effect. If, 'however, any distinction was' to be made in the treatment of the two bodies, the greater concession should undoubtedly have gone to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty/ to Animals.. I trust.l'bare succeeded in calming Mr. Palmer's "wrath.—l aril,. etc., , ' T. C. A. HISLOP. . July 11, 1914. ..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140713.2.95.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2200, 13 July 1914, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
464

COUNCILLOR HISLOP IN REPLY. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2200, 13 July 1914, Page 10

COUNCILLOR HISLOP IN REPLY. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2200, 13 July 1914, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert