Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL OF SIR STUART SAMUEL

HIS VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. Ej Telecra-ph—Frcs.s Association—Oopyrlstii London, February 23, In the King's .Bench Division'of tjie High Court last week, William Bird, a common informer, claimed £13,000 and costs against Sir Stuart Samuel, M.P., that aitwunt representing the aggregate penalties incurred bv Sir Stuart- for voting in the Houfo of Comtnoiis while lis firm was the contractor far the supply of silver to the India Office. Mr. Justice Rowlatt, under a statute of tho yflar 1S01 ; awarded £500 tor each of bis. twenty-six votes, He granted a stay of 'execution. Sir Sttsart Samuel is now appealing.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140225.2.53

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1993, 25 February 1914, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
104

APPEAL OF SIR STUART SAMUEL Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1993, 25 February 1914, Page 7

APPEAL OF SIR STUART SAMUEL Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1993, 25 February 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert