Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WIDOW'S DISCOVERY

; AFTER HER HUSBAND'S DEATH. '. ;;i(By Telegraph.-Prios Association.) ■"' '•'";.■'■.,-.. '.'■New Plymouth, February 4. ' 'A strango ftory of matrimonial ehtanglemcnts was unfolded ,in tho ; Supreme Court to-day, when Clara ridge, of New widow, proceeded against the Public' Trustee for an order to set asido_ the transfer of her property t6, Benjamin Enroth, made at a';iimo when slip believed, herself his, Wife. Enroth was a man nearly seventy years of age, and he lived for five year's at;New; Plymouth with Mrs. Berridge, . whom ho married in 1906. stating that lieiwas-a-widower; Enroth posed as a religious man, and taught in a,Sunday tichool. He died in 1911, and it was subsequently discovered that' his' name/was Ebenezer 'Jiiorne, and that'he had a wife living in.Brisbane. ■ ■!;In tlieproceodings to-day, evidence was Riven that .Enroth married one Kate Hoopwell in England, and went to Sydney.' His wifo died, and he then married Mdrali E. Lane, but left her. Ho .next ■ft<>nt to England, and married a widow named Mrs. Earle. , She died,- and he ■obtained her , estate, and camo to Now Plymouth, where ho married the plaintiff in the action in 1906. He induced her in 1907 to .transfer certain land to him, and also obtained'£loo from her. He built houses on the property, and mortgaged it .for £745. He then made another will, leaving her 30s. a week, and a'reyersion to Mrs.-Earle nnd the daufrhterjbf his first'wife. In 1911, when dyin", he had a will made in Mrs. Be'rridge's '.favour, but. was too ill to' siiyi jb,;,arid died, leaving her practically destitute. . ■•''•• . .; jTlie evidence: of the, plaintiff was that Enroth'or Thome had sold her property, took the' proceeds of it, and said' that ho": had property, worth £11.(100. ' Ho tf.dk her, to Auckland in 1908 to meet his daughter, v/\\o',\ in .the 'course of a quarrel, «aid: "Yon' are not father's wife; he has a wife in Brisbane. Enroth made a plausible explanation, and she,believed it. j The fact's camo to -li£ht after;]iis death.- '■■ .-■'■' ■The,case is proceeding.. - : .■ ■. ,■ ■ • .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140205.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1976, 5 February 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
331

WIDOW'S DISCOVERY Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1976, 5 February 1914, Page 5

WIDOW'S DISCOVERY Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1976, 5 February 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert