MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
■ l||||pisEßtDD«: ; f'';, ' n , .K'6nl'Saturday;;Mr:'vgfsi?EvaiisFS;M'^ ■ :: of' v Loo.?Shook's ; claim,-against: Francisy.Walla.cerMacken- , zie;>ye. specialist, for '£182. as wages-for I ■ about.three years'Cnnd a,Vhalf!s. , .\york : 'at] £l : pers'weekipn;?a: : bus/|.;farinTnear;iKa 1 : .whia; ,^, On thb.!two previous' daysVthe- de-.. '. .fendant'ihad.conducted his taso'iirper- 1 6on; on" , Saturday ho was''represented by Mri-C.'-.H. v The defendant continued liis evidenced He stated inter alia-that Loo Shook; had': never asked liimior money.■■•'■ '' Mr.' Meredith :,.Did Loo:.Wai ,ask:/you" ; for money? -'/fyti ■' ■' Dr.".Mackenzie':" Yee/ihe.: a'slcdd'-itSm" the name, of charity.* Ho "said that ho . wimted to seud it to s-omo poor relatives. I would probably, hnve given it to him .if.l had had it, : just as.l would probably. . give you £20 ; if .you needed. it,.f I'm a ■ terrible follow for giving l woney-' , away." That's, why ;l've '■.'. :■' Mr. , -; Meredith.:. Youf got. Loo,-Wat to sign a' receipt?—"Yes, , .l got himito ; sign a stamped receipt for anything. If owed him as paid.in full."? ■'■'' ::^;?;;': - : 'i'ri?%3t'i'".'' " ''i-'What did'you owe him?—" Nothing.", ,' Why did you want.a. receipt thenar l -, '"To beat the , Chinese Consul.■'■.. Wasn't' ■ that wise?' !: : i ..:' : j'^'..^i.;s':. , f'K'rl: i j.sf i; V'r??i-. ■ Yesterday you said that.yb'u'/wouldn't hwit anyone?-r."You'try' mei'i'*'!;'*-I'^'.1 '^'. His Worship'agreed'to let Mr.'fTread- ' well have a copy, of , 3iis uoteß'.'of'.tho eftso in order! that he (Mr.'Treadwell) ro-exainino Dr. . . The case was ;then..adjourncd,.tilli2.lo , p.m. '■ tp-morrowlv: if:???. :;As±£W&;jijS ; >i: 1 ' ;«£'>. ■ ',vi:*y V;.-Aif«^i£i;^Mf-- ' ■ '^.SEAMAN'SCONDIICT^IiyI , ..: • Mr.W.'G.'Riddell^.M^eaJlwith. ■ the police business;; ''■Jr.-.-s : h>^M:;.%^' ' Arthur Walker, a"pantryman from-.tho ■ steamer Kuiprira, , was charged with having disobeyed the orders of the.'chief of- ! ficor of tho vessel. It was stated tliat the man had been 'ucti 11 g very strnngely for some time, 'and thatjit. secmod .<lb-_ ■ sirablo that he sknild.bo examine!.h.V a doctor. Tho Kaipara wa's'to:=Bairtiiat . day, but it was eoiistdered'best,t!i'at the defendant skmld.ba sent,-Home", by., one eii tho coropany^ss'ships r; wliicli;.ci>rned';ft' . doctor.v- , :::- ■'' £^".>~ : -is"f%&'?ff#,"; ■'■ Tho ; caso was' ad.joitnied,.';till;. to-day, when Dr; ; Gilm'eKwill s;ive evidence;.as; to' tho defendant's.Ccbnditioiil^jTj;^?^- , ■May Gibbons, who ''was found loitering inYoFk Street for an unlawful; purpose, was sentenced. to'onc .month's impnson- ■■■ Thomas'Newton,Withers was fined £3 ' for insobriety. Respecting an'alk-sation that ho broke his prohibition, order, Iks was remanded till to-day.■';•'■' ■".""'J"; Thomas John Knudsou and;- William Sellar were each fined £l, : ,for;breaking the peace in Tory. Street.': , •■ ■;"';■■ ■ Thomas Siieehan was fined £2 for. in-6obriety,-and a prohibition. ..order.'.was mado against.him, ■'■ < ■ /■■ ~i\,- : -'- »;■■■■■; i "
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140119.2.73
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1961, 19 January 1914, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
368MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1961, 19 January 1914, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.