MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1934, 17 December 1913, Page 11

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

'::'--'-THE, BOOrCMAKER. -" BENCH-IMPOSES .A FINE OF £20. I» the Jla"istrate's Court yesterday Mr' Hiddcll delivered judgment in the case iir which Harry Wales was charged that being a bookmaker, he had betted in the Clarendon Hotel on October 10 His Worship-said-that the police statement as to Wales's being a book-maker-had not been" challenged, .there w.-.s also evidence of a bet; and he would line defendant £20..'. ' COIAECTCHi'B LAPSE." James Miirdock: Miller was charged with the theft of £7 Us. Gd. belonging to the Colonial Mutual Life Insurance Society. Ltd. He pictidcd guilty. - Chief-Detective lirbberg stated that Miller was a collector. He had received the amount mentioned in the charge last week and should have put it in on Fridav. Yesterday he put, in a statement 'showing that lie had collected the monev,- but" had not handed it over. - It seemed that he. had been in finaii- - cial distress, and had used the money to meet some : call upon him. There ■ was nothing else against the man, who had several young " children, and was' in very poor circumstances.The' Magistrate said that-.Miller's act would bring him a good deal of punishment in any .case, and, therefore, lie would ■ merely ■ convict him and order ■ him to appear for sentence when'called ) on..- Sis months in which-to refund ! the r nioney/werc.allowed: .'--. '?'"'. ';/;-'tEX : -''m6nTHS --''WANTED." fined £3i in default' fourteen' days'- imprisonment, for '" having entered a hut'ol while prohibited. . Chief-Detective Broberg said that'the • od'eiice-.was. committed about ten months ;*■ neo,'.'.and.'-that-.the. "police -.had -only- just " licchX! ) '2/t&:find;fM^ainiing.-gy:.l : '~ ■ -. 0f :'"^E^iTFb>^'BiSN!Ji'':' ' : ' Jukes , : was' lined; £3 for having n used 'certain "language/ in Tui Street, v and was remanded;respecting a charge , that she-was idle' and- disorderly.. She -.'.,, 'frequcntl,y,'iiiterriipted..'a constable who * v;as Magistrate ,'■" deeincd;'herM6"br-:;'in'-..tao ..excited a- con- "'■ Villion'for-the. Co!.irt'..t(i .proceed with ?:, .' %,- ) ;31ary; : Gilibpiis;yveui-to^Mount; : ;C()<ik ... I'olice.Station'-ouiMonday Vtolny a c0m- .,,, piaint/and swhile'Sthero" became ■> so 'an- ■?■"'' n'o.vcd ■■tliat-'slic'Abhiko'ih;". window," and " hurled- a...inissilo;.a'ii'd.;-.a ;:torrciit. of ,bad ' language police.--VShe | wasVfincd:"£o,'' : ''aiid ordered .to. pay £1 I t>s:-;.(lhc : yalue .:' H ~' .Au! ' fi'rio);, b F., :. '\£S i .'jv'as"'' imposed onfOscai" D .Fredw;ii , k'9:ifpn'ssi)ii''^' i for.i;-,liiivinK.{ i used I thveateiiiiigl4)ehayiou'rS-'Tise.f charge was I the""outconu|:irif;y\S;fight? oivillio .steamer I liav--1 "jjsi/l'or.y I ; : ;?'Kiir|im;pbnc^:;jp!imSii^ 1v en l'uc; cpni f: ' ■ -;■ I --'S'A'Jinv'-'"()[ ;, 12 : ycars..t\v'a's , '':rommitted- to il :■ for.'.:the & j tlieftlpf.^.bicytdp^yir-"^"f." l ,o"-

'■ for. .brcahing .■■Ui« |3|j;H KftxDEFEXUED,; CASESi||f* \ :^iiiSt!ioTfoi!6win)i'M':i!»s:."Jlrr J?*f : S; ' Ev.-ius;' .SLA!.',''entered judgment -lor 'tho -' nlaintifl'sMiv default;—W:- J!; : .Suckling ' v.H-i(iorK(!'!-V\'clls, £2 12s.- Gil., costs.!as.-; | ( James-Wi. Campbell v. Artlmr Jackson, , ■il{)-:<ls,;-6(!..-'"aml'i£3-os.-..6i1.;--W,--.H.- ] Suckling v-. J"oJ»n Young, £3 8s; 5t1.,"mnl < '£i---Ss/; George; and Geor|j;p vUA.'-il.; 1 To'ogood,"£s'fc. 2d., and .Cl's'Ss.:- 6d.'; j Garnet Sims v.- -W.-J. Compton,£L' and , \ Bsv ;■■' Samuel ; Brown,-. Ltd.,' , John>Boll, £5 "*=.,■ and- £L-ss/,Gd.; ■■ Tliomas- Mills-v. J.. C. Montifiori,-.£ll 19s.'!)<!., and .CI 10s; Gd.; Geo. Doughty . and'C'o. v..-Joins Smith, £s.lis. (id., and i ■CI 3s. Cd.; James Smith,' Ltd.;'' v>Arthur V. Mitrliol. £3 lis/2d.;, and 10s.'; A '■ I'atersou and Sons v.-. Geo. Godfrey Mavtin; £5,';: and £1-' os.>6d. ;-.-: James ■Smith,- Ltd.,' v. Joseph ■- Allred Fah.V, £13 4s. 'Id., and £1. 10s. 6d.: Miggs and. O'Don'ncll v. Wright, -Hell Patent- Co., Ltd., £98\6s. Cd., and £1-195.; Wilforc) and Levi. v. J. A. Goodson, £15 los., and £1 10s. (id.; same v. W. S. Jenkins, £2 Bs.,' and 10s.; G. H. Thornton v. Kriniicombo; and Fry, £8 os.' 3d., and Cl'3s. Gd.;' Scliaefcr and Co. v. G. A. Jl'llvriue. £10 18s., and £1 10s. 6d.; 'Arts Willi, Incorporated (in liquidation) v.' W. W. Corbeit, £1 Is., and Bs.; G. 1L •..Thornton v. Alice Bmven, £1 ss. lid., and OS.: Tonks and Andrews v. Norman Gibbs, £4 12s. 6d., and 165.; Hubert G.' TXmtoii v. Norinftn Gibbs, 17s. 3d., and Bs.; -Wellington Trades Agency v. A. B. Corrigan, 125., andss.; T."E. K. Burgess v. Annie Wallace, £5 18s., and'. £1 3s. Cd.; same, v. Joseph Mason,--£3.195.. and 305.; John- Telford v. Alex. Sutherland, £2 155., and 10s, ; Palace C0.,-Ltd., v. A. I). Corrigan, £9 175., and £1 3s. Cd.