Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRIAL DIVORCE.

TEST AT HONEYMOON RENDEZVOUS. "Men and women of to-day 'arc foolish to go through life in loveless wedlock. Many have not tho courage of their convictions and remain married -uidr'e!y because the-jTffiar criticism. Wc pass through this world only once, and why not let.our journey he ono of happiness?"' In these words, Sirs. John Van Alstyne, tho wife of a Missouri capitalist, proclaims to-day lior contentment with tho terms of a trial idvoree agreed upon between herself and her husband on June 2 last. . The agreement contained tho.' following provisions :■—

Separation for a period of six months. No communication to ■ pass between the couple during that time. Tho couple to meet on December 2 at Colorado Springs in tho same hotel they visited-oh-their honeymoon twoyears ago. If, on meeting, they de» oido to bo legally divorced, the divoreo to be carried through without naming a correspondent.

Through ..tho medium of tho newspapers Mrs. Van Alstyne, who is residing temporarily at Los Angeles, now •says: "Three months' absence has not made my heart grow fonder, but convinced mo that I want a divorce. Our married life was never marred by cruelty or unkindness. There is no other man of woman in the case, but wo hare come to a full realisation that wo are unsuited to each other, , that Wo have ceased to love, and that our marriage is only a mockery."

Mr. Van Alstyno is .spending his period of trial divorce by travelling in Europe.

The. Auckland Weekly Half-Holiday Rill, a local Bill .introduced into tho House- of Representatives this session to permit of a fresh' half-holiday poll being taken in tho whole weekly halfholiday district, has apparently been given its quietus. The justification for the Bill in tho beginning was some agitation, and a series of petitions bearing somo 17,000 signatures asking for a .now poll. The Bill was, however, opposed in tho House, and among the opponents was Mr. A. Harris, member for certain suburban districts of Auckland. As a reply.to this petition, sonib of the supporters of tho Saturday half-holiday organised other petitions. These have been presented to tho House, with gome 16,000 signatures. Yesterday, . when these petitions wore referred by the House of Representatives to i-ho Labour Bills Committee,.Mr. J. H. Bradney, member for Auckland West, who is in charge of tho Bill, said that in view of tho fact that there was such a strong body of opinion in Auckland against the Bill ho would not press it. In fact, ho would bo quite prepared to drop it. /

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19131114.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1906, 14 November 1913, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
425

TRIAL DIVORCE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1906, 14 November 1913, Page 3

TRIAL DIVORCE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1906, 14 November 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert