Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW-DRAFTING.

Sir,—We have seen lately somo curiosities in tho way of papers set foi examination. It would seem the schoolmaster is not so frequent io his visits to the Government Buildings as he might be if the recent Bill for the amendment of the law of libel be any criterion. In your summary of its provisions in Saturday's Dominion you quoto one provision as follows:—"It is lawful to publish defamatory matter if tho matter is true, and it is for the public benefit that the publication should be mado." In this short sentence there are two errors in syntax and one—thero oould not be more —in punctuation. The (proverbial) sixth-form schoolboy would, it is to bo hoped, construct the sentence as follows:— "It .is lawful to. publish defamatory matter if tho matter bo true and is for tho public benefit," etc. The latter part of the sentence as quoted in the first instance above is, to say the least, inelegant: "that the publication should bo made," is clumsy phrasing. Far better, with fewer words, to say "that the publication should be mode"; but. better still, "that the matter bo published." Throughout, tho draftsman seems not to know the rule as to the subjunctive mood. The next quotation is in much the same plight .as the first. "Whether a comment is or is not fair," etc., is incorrect. It should be: "Whether a comment be or be not fair.' etc. Further on, the'same fault appears again: "If security as aforesaid is not given," surely should read—"be not given." This may appear hyper-criticism, ns the slovenly style of such drafting is common in speech and in careless composition, but we might at least expect verbal exactitude in an Act of Parliament.—l am, etc.. NOT "DR. PANGLOSS." July 21. ' P.S.—I have only referred to the construction of sentences. But is it not bad drafting to refer to matters bo "lawful" or otherwise when referring to civil liability? Lawfulness or tho reverse has reference rather to the criminal side of the law of defamation.—N."D.P."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130728.2.11.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1813, 28 July 1913, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

LAW-DRAFTING. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1813, 28 July 1913, Page 4

LAW-DRAFTING. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1813, 28 July 1913, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert