Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW REPORTS.

SUPREME COURT.

FIRM OF "VALENTINE AND GO." MADE BANKRUPT. Bing, Harris and Co. applied to have John Ferguson and M. Ferguson (his wife) adjudicated bankrupts. Mr. A. Dunn appeared in support of tho application. It was stated that the affidavits filed were to tho cffect that Fergusons, who had been trading at Petone and Lower Hutt as Valentine and Co., were ,£B2 in debt to Bing, Harris and Co., and .£Bl in debt to Abbott, Oram ami Co. It was added that on May 31, John Ferguson left Wellington, and that before leaving, he had said that he was in trouble over a lease and was going to "clear out." Further, it was put before tho Court that Ferguson had sold the Petone business, and that the Lower Hutt shop was in the possession of h creditor.The Court made an order of adjudication. COMPENSATION CLAIM. LAW POINTS. The Compensation Court concluded the hearing of evidence in the action in which John James Boyd claimed .£2OOO as compensation from the Wellington City Corporation for alleged depreciation (through the alteration of tho street) of land and six houses in part of Queen's Drive which was formerly known as CbiUlers Torraco. His Honour Mr. Justice Sim presided, and the assessors were Mr. William Ferguson (for the corporation), and Mr. A. L. Wilson (for Boyd). Sir John Findlay, with him Mi. D. M. Findlay, appeared in support of tho claim, and Mr. J. O'Shea, city solicitor, opposed it. When tho evidence was; concluded Sir John Findlay said that as Mr. O'Shea had raised the question of whether tho road was or was not a permanent way, he would like an adjournment for the purpose of calliuK evidence on tho point. His Honour suggested stating a case for tho Court of Appeal on the question of whether a road formed in part was a permanent thoroughfare.

Tho case was then adjourned till 0.30 on Tuesday morning for tho calling of evidence as to the dedication of tho street.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130609.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1771, 9 June 1913, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1771, 9 June 1913, Page 3

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1771, 9 June 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert