LAW REPORTS.
SUPREME COURT. PROCEEDINGS FOR DIVORCE. THE JONES CASE. Evidence in tlie divorce action of Albert I'M win Jones v. Jane Jones and I-.uniund Crow was concluded yesterday morning before Mr. Justice Sim and a jury °f twelve. After a retirement of 1G minutes 111* jury returned with a verdict against .Mrs. Jones and Crow. They found that there hail been misconduct between them and that Jones had not connived at it. They awarded Jones £100 damages. A" decree nisi granted, and costs were given against Crow.
CASE DISCONTINUED. . The action of James Bernard Picot 'against Arthur and Eserton AA arburton, a claim lor ,£SOO as damages for injuries alleged to have been received in a motorcar accident, was to have been commenced yesterday, but Messrs. A. H. Hindmarsh (counsel for the plaintiff) and I. AVilford (counsel for the defendant) appeared, and stated that it had been derided to discontinue the case.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130528.2.31
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1761, 28 May 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
153LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1761, 28 May 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in