MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1726, 18 April 1913, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Dr. A. M'Arthur, S.M.) "WONDERLAND." ' THE COMMISSION CLAIM. In the Magistrate's Court yesterday, Dr. M'Arthur, S.M., delivered judgment in the case in which A. C. Symoiub,.commission agent, Wellington, sued William Duncan, commission agent, Auckland, ior •BUG 17s. Cd., which amount plaintiff alleged defendant had received tor him as commission on tin* sale of the Mirnmnr plant known as "Wonderland." His Worship said that the whole question was: Was there a partnership or not between the plaintiff and the defendant? In his opiniou there was not, and he gaye judgment for the amount claimed, wun costs. RATES CLAIM. Tho Karori Borough obtained judgment against Catherine O'Connor respecting a claim of .£0 Us. 7d. for rates. ROWE~V. FINCH. The case of G. Bow© v. A. Finch is reported at length in another column. UNDEFENDED CASES. In tho following cases judgment was entered for tho plaintiffs: by default :-01bco Appliance Co., Ltd., v. R. P. Meeshaclc, £i os. Gd., nud costs 155.; Charles Willcox Smith and J. G. lioldsworth v. John M. Smith, £2, and 105.; Kobertstein Bros. v. Frank Diamond, M 13s. Gd., and 55.; John Fitchett, v. Alfred Bradley, £H 3s. 3d., and 125.; New Zealand Loan and Mercantile Agency Company, Ltd., v. John David Howell, .£57 Gs., and £Z 18s. 6d.; Karon Borough Council v. Alexander J. Pollock, ■£!) 9s. 6d„ and 75.; same v. George Noble, M Bs. 9d., and 7.5.; same v. Sidney E. Mason, .£2 17s. lid., and 65.; same v. Hugh L. Cartwright, .£4 135., aud 65.; Commercial Agencv, Ltd., v. J. M'Hardy, £bl IGs. 3d., and £1 35.; L. Loubere v., Robert Whyte, £5 10s., and £1 3s. Gd.; Thomas Brown, Ltd., v. James W. Orbell, Jfl9 Is. M., and £1 10s. Gd.; Van Staveren Bros. v. Mervyn Littlejohn, Is., and 5s t< ; same v. Frank Cook, £i, and_ss.; A. a. Paterson and Co., Ltd., v. W. J. Cox and Co., £17 10s., and £i Bs. Gd.; Joseph Nathan and Co., Ltd., v. J. Campbell, £2 195., and- 10s.; Veitch aud Allan v. J. W. Proetor, £3 is. id., and 10s.; William Alfred Brown , V. Joreph Bramwcll, £G 12s. lid., and ,£i"3s. Gd.; Laery and Co., Ltd., v. 11. Bruhn, JEHi Ids. sd„ and 155.; H. C. Gibbons and Co., Ltd., v. Wm. Jackson and W. M. Jackson, the younger, M Us. 2d., and 175.; Commercial Agency, Ltd., v. John H. Andrell, £3 15s. Id., and lis.; Foltz Cohen v.' J. T. M'Kelvie, JCS, and 55.; and Ralph M. Green v. Daniel Gunn, £i 10s., aud 10s. | JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. I J. Emerson, was ordered to pay C. Hill I aud Sons .SI at the rate of ss. per month; J. W. Bull to par J. Bradley .£9 Bs'. Gd. by May 1; Charles Onyon to pay Wellington Loan Co., Ltd., M iGs. Gd. by May 1; and William Wilson to pay H. Doherty £i ss. lOd. by May 1. POLICE BUSINESS. i (Before Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M.) John M'Kinnou was fined 10s. for insobriety.