Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

(Before His Honour Mr. Justice Chapman) • TRANSFER OF . ESTATE. . ACTION TO SET IT ASIDE.

'An action to .set aside the transfer of ' estate and to' obtain an account of: administration' came .before Mr. Justice Chapman in the, Supreme ; Court yesterday. ; The . subject matter of- the .'action , was/property loft by the late Robert Tannahill Watson, formerly a baker,of Granity, in the province of Nelson. The i plaintiff in.the.action was one. of the • deceased's daughters, Lillias Anne Watson; nurse, of Wellington. The defendants were . Jessio Watson, widow of the doce.ascd, and' Robert Tannahill Watson, hotelkceper (a son of tho deceased), both 1 of Granity. ' '' . ■ • ; \ ■ •The Hon. A. L. Herdman, with Mr. L. K. Ri'rkcaldie,. appeared for Ihe plaintiff;. Mr. I C. P.'Skerrctt, K.C.,-with. Mr. . G. 11. Fell appeared for the defendant (Robert Tannahill .Watson); arid Mr. W. •T. rtrran appeared for the defendant (Jcs-' sio Watson);'. , < Certain Jaw .points, preliminiirr.ro.',the . action; had-teen ar'suod before'; his Honoui- last year, fnr-Hiei tmrpdiuiof'obtain•ing an, interpretation of deceascd's'.'will,' which ,'had been brought into. question. l His Honoiir subsequently decided that 1 tile'widow had. a life interest in the estate, and that' tho children had a present,vested interest not conditional upon . litheit surviving l their mother, r Mr! Herdimin jpivriii 1/rlet' review of the", facts yesterday before calling anv evidence. : It appeared that Robert Tanna- ; hill Watson, senior, died in 1692, leaving a widow and eleven children, and property consisting of .01 acres of leasehold lands. Tho net yaliie of the estate was £512 Bs.' sd. Tho defendant, Robert Tannahill Watson, a son of the deceased, : lived" with tho family at their hotel in Granity until 1891 when he Went to Cooleardio. i He returned .in 1895 and commenced to work at the hotel. The following year he opened n bunking account in his own name and paid' into it all .the money ■ derived from the bar nnd the . bearding part of the hotel. In the • license of the hotel was transferred to him while/two rears later his mother (the other defendant 'in the present action) transferred to him, for'a consideration of JJ2S, a section on which the hotel was' subsequently • rebuilt. _ Mrs. Watson had a life -interest only in the ■ section on which the hotel was re-built, but- she., transferred... the,.fee simplo; to. her son, Robert Tannahill Watson. In 1902. the latter.transferred the hotel to a Mr. Farquhar. The consideration was .£ISOO, for tho goodwill, .£IOO for the furniture, and i26o:a. year .'as.' rent. ' • Tho principal matters sought hy; the statement of claim were -an account of the, widow's administration of the estate; an'order that Robert Tannahill Watson (defendant) held certain money and hotel . property, as trustee for the other children and the widow; and ah -order tlint "the ourchase by Robert, Tannahill Watson (one of tho defendants) -of certain land from Jessio Watson.(the other defendant) be .rescinded: arid; the land ■ retfansferred to Mrs. Watspn to be lield as.part of tfio.' estate. ; ~ , It ■ wd9 mentioned in evidence by the plaintiff that Mrs. Watson was under the impression that she had. a right to transfer the property at the time, the sale was made, and "that, . though now joined as, a defendant,'.she was. desirous, of rectifying any mistake that 'had: been made. ' Several ..witnesses,'were called • yesterday morning, but at 2-p.m.,tho,hearing wa| not resumed as-the parties were endeavouring/to! arrive .at' a ' settlement.'. ' Shortly after; half-past '.lour, • Mr. Herdni'an was able to announce that the'parties had agreed upon a .'compromise. He handed'his Honour the terms in writing. His Honour- said he was glad the matter, had been so settled. 'As it had been allowed , ,to - driftfor so long' it was viously a case for an agreement between the parties. Judgment : was-given in i terms of the comproniise, leave being reserved to any party to iapply to the Court in regard to any point, which it , : might prore had not been provided for. .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130220.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1679, 20 February 1913, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
645

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1679, 20 February 1913, Page 3

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1679, 20 February 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert