AGRA MURDER TRIAL.

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1647, 14 January 1913, Page 7

AGRA MURDER TRIAL.

v ' » .•.. —■;■./ EVIDENCE CONTEADICTED. By Teleeraph—Press Association— Copyriffh ,(Ree. January 13, 8.25 p.mV) Agra, January 13. At the trial of Clark (formerly of th« Allahabad Medical Department) and Mrs Fulham, Budhu (a native servant), and other naVves, on charges of murdering Mrs. Clark and Mr. Pulham.'Mrs., Pul ham contradicted her daughter Kathleen'i evidence. ';'/''■'".; ' ■ Clark explained his movement on tlw night of the murder. He said he foun<! his wife unconscious when he'returnee home. " '• The police; have identified , a 6eventl accused, named Mohon, who had not'beei arrested, Budhu confessed that Hbhoi w,as Mrs. Clark's : actual. murderer. ■ Several of Mrs. Fulham's letters ti Clark were introduced, in.which she re fe'rred.to getting rid of Qlark's wife. Clark, in a statement, contradicted'i portion of, Kathleen Fulham's evidence He declared that he had not" instigatei tho murder, which was the work o thieves. Budhu's evidence was false, ani Mrs... Fulham's statement "describing th wrangements for his wife's murder weri untrue, and had been mado when Bhe wa unnoyed at his wifo and him. Tho magistrate has framed charges o murder against Budhu,' Eamlal, Kitkhia Budhakanjir, and charges of abettini against Clark and Mrs.: Fulham. ' •