Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC.

■ •— -4 • A DEBATE ON FLOGGING. By Teleersmh—Prcis Association—OoDjrleht London, Novembor 29. In the House of Lords, the Criminal Law Amendment Bill, which deals with, the white slave traffic, was read a second time. . • The Lord Chancellor (Lord Haldane), the Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Davidson), and Lord Lansdowne (Leader of the Opposition) supported the flogging of men engaged in the traffic. The Marquis of Crewe, Secretary of State for India, opposed flogging. He said he preferred indeterminate sentences, Lord Lytton objected to flogging, but favoured the branding of male and female procurers. Lord Alverstone, Lord Chief Justice, favoured flogging. He said he had known criminals,howl even when only sentenced to flogging.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121202.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1612, 2 December 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
113

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1612, 2 December 1912, Page 5

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1612, 2 December 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert