Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BATH-TUB TRUST.

-— : — — COMBINATION DECLARED ILLEGAL. By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright (Rec. November 19, 10 p.m.) Washington, November 19. Tho United States Supremo Court has given its.decision in the Bath-Tub Trust case. The decision fixes the principle that there can bo no monopoly in tho unpatented product of patented machines without violating the Sherman anti-trust law. The combination, which comprises 85 per ccnt. of the enoilieled ware manufactures of America, is thus declared illegal. AN INGENIOUS COMBINATION.'' Under the American patent laws a patentee may fix the price at which a patented article may bo sold. In the . bath-tub case the patent, which is us;d as a device to justify a combination lor the purpose of fixing prices and eliminating competition,, is a patent, not upon tho article manufactured by the combination, but upon an insignificant toot used m -its manufacture. Tho prosecution is brbught against sixteen corporations engaged in the manufacture of all kinas of enameled iron ware used in the plumbing of a house, such ns bathtubs, wash-basins, kitchen sinks, etc. Early in 1909, after a long series of conferences among the different manufacturers of tho enameled ware, the patents on a little tool used in the manufacture were n.pigned to a young man, apparently without capital, named Waymouth. Immediately thereupon this young man granted a; license to each of tlie manufacturuis companies for the use of these patents, under n contract which fixed pi'iccs throughout from the manufacturer., •to the consumer, and which provided that iio manufacturer should sell to any jobber who handled independent goods, or who refused to sign a contract. , Sevens penalties were prescribed for failure to live to the terms of this license agreement. Complete control of wholesale, jobbing, and retail nrices of tho enameled waro whs the result.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121120.2.56

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1602, 20 November 1912, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
293

BATH-TUB TRUST. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1602, 20 November 1912, Page 7

BATH-TUB TRUST. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1602, 20 November 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert