Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW REPORTS

SUPREME COURT. (Before his Hoiiour the Chief Justice.) THE CRIMINAL SESSIONS. TRIAL OF KNOX. NO VERDICT AGREED UPON. Tho criminal sessions of the Supremo Court wore continued yesterday before the Chief Justice (Sir Robert Stout). Mr. If. H. Ostler, of the Crown Law Office, appeared for the Crown. A tailor, named William Knox, was charged with performing illegal operations oil a girl seventeen years oi .age. There were three separate and distinct charges relating to incidents in different placss in Wellington in September, 1911. Knox, who pleaded not guilty, was defended by Sir. T. M. Wilford (instructed by Messrs. Btzgibbon and Pcrty), with whom' was associated Mr. W, Perry. His Honour' ordered the Court to .bo cleared during the hearing of the case, and made an order prohibiting the publication of evidence. The jury retired at 3.30 p.m. , After being absent for lour hours, tho jury were unable to agree:, and -were discharged. ' , . , Mr. Ostler applied for a flew trial, and his Honour granted the application, fixing the date as Monday next. IN DIVORCE, CONNINGHAM, V. CONNINGHAM. A further phase of the Cunningham case was heard in the SupTeme Court in Chambers yesterday, before Mr. Justice Sim. Mr. J. W. Jackson, appearing for Mrs. Conningham, moved to strike out the divorce petition,, Arthur- Conningham v.Alice Conningham and Sarry Andrews, for.want of prosecution. The petitioner had, -it appeared, taken no steps to prosecute his petition since the. action commenced .some months ago. His Honour made an order dismissing the petition as asked. LANDS NOT REQUIRED. IS THERE POWER TO SELL THEM?. In the Supreme Court in Chatnbefs yesterday, Mr, Justice Sim heard argument on an interesting question in .company law. The parties concerned were the Cheltenham Dairy Co., Ltd,, plaintiffs, and Janles Jlichie, farmer, of Feilding, defendant. Mr. C. B. Morison appeared for the company, while.Mr. A. W. Blair appeared for Michio.. The action'was in the form of an originating suhVhiohs asking foT a declaratory judgment as to Whether the company had in its merilorandum. of association implied power to sell lands which were, not required for its business. The articles dealt with minor matters, anil expressly, empowered the company to. keep pigs, but there was no direct authority to sell iand. ~ - . ' , After hearing argument, his Honour reserved decision. *

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121107.2.75

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1591, 7 November 1912, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

LAW REPORTS Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1591, 7 November 1912, Page 9

LAW REPORTS Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1591, 7 November 1912, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert