Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A MINIATURE "FREE CHURCH" CASE.

IMPOBTANT LEGAL DECISION. The Scottish, correspondent of ■ the "Guardian" (London) writes:— The supremacy of tho civil law in matters spiritual Has again, been demonstrated in connection with a. Dundee congregation which deemed itself the freest of the free. The congregation originally belong-' ed to the Untied Presbyterian. Church, but its minister, finding his Creed too definite for the rango of his mind, and.no. other body in Scotland with a confession comprehensive enough for his taste, proceeded to set up what may bo described as a schism bused upon a constitution which committed no one to anything more than promise of allegiance to "the Spirit of Christ." This took place in the year 1879, and for a time the Free Christian Church, as the congregation styled itself, ' pursued its way, Christian in name nnd intention,' but void of anything resembling creed' or dogma. Olio might suppose that the freedom thus achieved was ample enough to satisfy the niost critical mind, but the time camo when even this "broad" constitution became too narrow for tho liberal spirits which had been nourished on undogmatic Christianity; and last.year it was determined that a fresh constitution should bo drafted on still "larger" lines, and a new name given to the congregation. This was duly carried into elfect, and the congregation under the sounding title of "The Church of To-day" was established on a constitution to which even, tho name of- Christ was denied admittance. Unfortunately for "The Church of To-day" there was an obstinate minority headed by a certain Mr.. John Ness,.blacksmith, and nino others, who found this advance on the path of liberty more than they could endure, nnd thoy appealed to the Law Courts to vindicate, their adherence to "the Spirit of Christ." The Lord Ordinary; Lord Cullen, in deciding the other dp,y for the minority, found that 'The Church of To-day' was not entitled to tho property acquired by the congregation professing allegiance to "tho Spirit of Christ." The result is that "The Church of To-day , ", is enabled to go forward on the path of free thought only through the sacrifice of its worldly possessions. Tho. congregation has had the sentence of disendowinont passed upon it after a scrutiny of its doctrinal position by the King's Court, nnd once again Scotland is reminded of the futility of attempt inq to set up "a frco Church in n free State."- It would, indeed, be ft serious matter if the State-sanctioned tho transference, of property ncauired ostensibly under a profession of Christianity, however vague, to n body which has resolved to expunge tho name of Christ from its constitution.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120921.2.98

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1551, 21 September 1912, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
440

A MINIATURE "FREE CHURCH" CASE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1551, 21 September 1912, Page 9

A MINIATURE "FREE CHURCH" CASE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1551, 21 September 1912, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert