REEFTON MINING TROUBLE
PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT. ' (Br TelccraDh.—Pros* Außoclatlon.i ■ Recfton, August 30. Evans, general superintendout nf Ihe Consolidated, Progress, ' nnd lllackwafer Company, wroto to the Jnangalnia Miner.'.' tTnion on August .22 suggesting (lint a settlement ho arrived ot under Hip Arbitration Act of ISOB, not Ihn .Industrial Conciliation Act. The lull text of the lotler was published this ovemmr in the local p,n)>or. He that all mailers in dispute be referred lo two arbitrators, one representing each party; that an umpire l>e mutually decided on by arbitralion, or in tho event of disagreement by the president of tho Arbitration Court; that all questions in dispute be settled by arbitrators; in the case of failure Ihe arbitrators (o agree lo the umpire's decision; both Darlies to pledge themselves to agree to (lie decision nnd restart work: the cost of arbitration lo lin fixed by Iho arbitrators and paid for by each parly, as the arbitrator or umpire shall doierminc. The above was put forward as a suggestion. The Miners' Union secretary replied stating that it had been discussed at a nie-ling of Ilia union, and referred to the Federation of Labour Executive.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120831.2.59
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1533, 31 August 1912, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
191REEFTON MINING TROUBLE Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1533, 31 August 1912, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in