Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FRANCHISE REFORM.

BILL IN THE COMMONS. WOMAN SUFFRAGE QUESTION i RAISED. UNIONIST AMENDMENT. By Teleeraph—Press Association— Copyright (Rec. July 9, 11.25 p.m.) London, July !). In moving tho second reading of tho Franchise Bill in tho House of Commons, Mr. Lewis Harcourt, Secretary of State for the Colonies, said ho considered that one vote one value was a necessary corollary of olio man one vote. The Government intended to pass both, together with a Redistribution Bill, beforo the nest election. Ho did not think t.ho House was prepared at the present moment to add 10j million women to t'lto electorate. ' ' Mr. E. G. Pretyman (Unionist) moved an Opposition amendment declining to proceed with a measure on tho most important aspect of which, namely, female suffrage, the Government were admittedly not agreed; which leaves tho most glaring electoral inequalities unremedied, and which is framed solely in the interests of one party. Mr. Pretyman said clauses ought to be inserted enacting that the Bill shall be inoperative until redistribution was passed. Other Unionists described the Bill os tricky, incomplete, unworkable, and mere jerrymandering. Sir Arthur Markham (Liberal) said he desired the abolition of plural voting, but he was also a supporter of woman suffrage. The Bill was a positive insult to educated women, whom it excluded, while admitting three million men who never ought to vote. Mr. J. A. Pease, President of the Board of Education, warmly resented Sir Robert Mnlny's argument regarding University representation—that the Government wa; influenced by mean and petty motives. The debate was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120710.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1488, 10 July 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
255

FRANCHISE REFORM. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1488, 10 July 1912, Page 5

FRANCHISE REFORM. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1488, 10 July 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert