Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANALYSING DOG TALK.

A SCIENTIST AVITH A PHONOGRAPH. '[ho talking dog of ono of the Kaiser's game wardens has been a popular wonder in . Germany for soino time. Ho could 6<iv yes and"no, givo his name when asked, mid'repeat a number of other words nppiopriatsiy. The truth of "Don's" human vocalisntion was altented by dozens of witnesses, among them not a few persons deserving tho label of scientists. Hon has in Ihe past made popular copy for the newspapers, in splendid quantities. But not long ago ho encountered a ivnl scientist, and now his reductive (lays from a lilorarv point of view, at least, are over. Oscar Pfungst, of the University of Berlin, who exposed "Clever Hans," the great German equine arithmetician, not long ago, devoted a few hours to a visit with Don, taking a recording phonograph with him. Since that call Don has been in eclipse in the scientific world at any rale. What the Herr Doctor found was this: Tho dog makes noises in rcspomo to questions as any do?, will. Th««o noises are interpreted by the hearers (by some o? them, that is), a 5 artieulnte answers lo the questions. They are,'fit a matter of fact, and lo the dog, nothing but lioi'es. As talked back by Ihe phonoeinpli. they might have been Choctaw, for all the meaning they conveyed lo Ihe nninslrnclcd henre-.

The wonder was, therefore, simply the result of pußgestion. The spectator knowing what the dog was expected to say. heard the expected word. The case was exnctlv similar to that of (lie listener who heirs the whipnoorwill «ny "Whip-ivor-Will." or the Katydid declare that "Kalv-did or "didn't."' In (he Whipnnnrwill ease, as Mr. IT. 11. .Tnhnsvui of .lulms Hopkins (who describes Mr. Pfungst's exposure of Don) explains, the noise is really .far more like "puf-ah-rih" than whip-noor-will, but the listener has no trouble in hearing the expected phrase.' Thus another animal savant is dipcredited, and it begins to look n.s if there renlly were a rather sharp limit to animal intelligence. Until somomo can educate his goose or pig or horse, or dog so that it can pass an elementary examination in humnn intelligence, (lie old-fashioned psychologists avo likely to slick to (heir sharp dividing line between homo sapiens and* (ho_ remainder of the animal world.—New York "Post."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120708.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1486, 8 July 1912, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
386

ANALYSING DOG TALK. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1486, 8 July 1912, Page 2

ANALYSING DOG TALK. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1486, 8 July 1912, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert