Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NELSON HARBOUR PROBLEM

Sir,-Oa Indny a deputation from Hip Nelsoni Harbour Board is to wait on tho lon. .Mr. Millar, Minister for Railways, lo urge the Government to increase tho vi ' °, f ,., ,v:l,er il!<ni H il I'ol'lion of the kelson Wharf, professedly "to necommod'ltn ocean liners.". I beg to point out hat this request, if gran>(l, would only menu iurthor money uselessly thrown "■way, and that it would not 'fit Nelson Harbour to accommodate ocean liners, but would only make shipping a littlo more convenient for the small vessels belonging o such companies as (ho Anchor and the Union Steam Ship Companies, whom alone, tho harbour improvements havo beneited hitherto. II is well known locally that (ho principal difficulty is not that connected with the inner harbour at -Nelson, but the existence of a liu'go bank of ceaselessly shifting sand and silt in tho miter harbour, blocking tho ontranco to the new cut dredged through tho Boulder Bank. This problem cannot bo solved without the further expenditure of nearly another million of money, on tho oop oi the 4:72,000 already expended on dredging, ami besides a nearly equal sum already spent by tho Government on ivhai'f extension.

liVea now the Nelson Harbour is practically condemned for ocean-going vessels, as lite agents of the chief shipping companies lniv.o told the Nelson Harbour Board that they dam not and will not again risk vessels of largo tonnage inside the treacherous sand-bank. What, then, is the good of wasting further money on operations inside the Boulder Bank?' I beg: lo suggest that any nionev spent bv tho Government in future should be put into a radically new scheme of harbour improvements, such as tho ship., canal scheme, which I proposed ten years ago, and which could even now bo carried out move cheaply and quickly than any attempt to cope with the treacherous sandbank which is throttling the industrial future of Nelson city and district—l om, "', JOSEPH TAYLOR. Nelson, Slarch 20.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120323.2.68.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
328

NELSON HARBOUR PROBLEM Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 6

NELSON HARBOUR PROBLEM Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1396, 23 March 1912, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert