SECRETS OF THE BEAUTY BUSINESS

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1087, 28 March 1911, Page 4

SECRETS OF THE BEAUTY BUSINESS

THE CHKISTCHURCII CASE. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) Christchurch, March 27. The secrets of the beauty business were divulged to a still greater extent at the Magistrate's Court this moraine, when the hearing of the case Eva Mabel Emerson v. Hemsley, Burnett, Ltd., was continued. Mr. H. W. Bishop, S.M., was on the bench. Plaintiff claimed .£25 premium paid to defendants to learn the business, and <£25 damages. Sho alleges that sho was not properly taught as the agreement, provided. The case was adjourned from last. Monday, wlren it was asoerlained that Mrs. Emma Barrett was the principal party iu Hemsley, Burnett, Ltd. Evidence was given by defendant Barrett and others, and the case closed. His "Worship said that up to a certain point he was entirely against defendant, who had clearly not fulfilled her part of the contract, but the contradictory evidence of that day ho wanted to consider clearly, ,11c would reserve his judgment. As a mere man he had to decide whether ihe.'c switches and other "whal-you-call-'oms" were made by plaintiff or not. Jt seemed to him an extraordinary thing when people, especially women, came into Court and said what they had. It was very unpleasant. Someone was lying, and it was for him lo say who. Judgment would be reserved.