THE MOKAU CASE.
Sir,—Dr. l'indlay, in.paragraph 3of his story from behind tho bridge in the Legislative Council, amongst other statements that will be questioned by me- at the proper time, sets forth that I signed an undertaking in London to lodge no further caveats in New Zealand in respect to the title to tho . Mokau property. He says Hue document was part of an agreement under which' I had undertaken to pay certain sums of money and failed to do so.. But he is silent upon tho fact, that this is stated in my petition to Parliament now awaiting to be investigated, umj the reason given that I was prevented- carrying out tho compact by.certain improper actions of the other side.. This should be well known to the Attorney-General, 'whose'duty is not under any pretext to prejudice a pending case.—l- am, etc., ■ J. JONES. Wellington, August 23. .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100825.2.91.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 904, 25 August 1910, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
147THE MOKAU CASE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 904, 25 August 1910, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in