Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DRAY AND MOTOR CAR.

&" COLLISION. CLAIM FOE DAMAGES. (By Telenraph—Press Association.) Christchurch, May 12. The Board of Governors of Canterbury Agricultural College were proceeded against to-day by Jesso Thomas Blakemore, who claimed £60 ss. Cd. for damages sustained by him in a collision between his motor-car and a dray driven by servants of the defendants. Counsel for plaintiff stated that on December G last plaintiff was motoring vfhen he met a dray belonging to the Lincoln ■ College, loaded. On the d-ray was a polo thirty feet in length, extending'from the horse's head at one end and about 13 feet beyond the back of tho dray. As tho two vehicles met the horse swerved, swinging the polo .round, and tho end strnck plaintiff, rendering him unconscious and incapable of controlling his car, with the result that it ran into a fence at tho side- of the road and was damaged. The caso was one which spoke for itself, as defendants, whilo entitled to carry a load, had rendered themselves liablo for any injury which was occasioned through tho load being carried in such a way that it might, have caused injury. As a result of the accident plaintiff's car was damaged, and for three weeks he had been wholly prevented from attending to his business; for two-weeks ho had been able to do only light work; and was still unable to perform duties that he had carried out previously. Evidence was given in support. The defence called in evidence to showthat the accident was due to plaintiff's negligent driving, and that it would not have occurred if ho had exercised proper care, and had not been driving so fast as to frighten the horse. On the application of counsel for the plaintiff, the case was adjourned for legal argument.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100513.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 816, 13 May 1910, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
298

DRAY AND MOTOR CAR. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 816, 13 May 1910, Page 6

DRAY AND MOTOR CAR. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 816, 13 May 1910, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert