Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Court Claim Follows Motor Collision

The sequel to an accident on the Waikawa Bridge, Manakau, at, about midnight on August 2 last was the hearing of a civil claim for £106 10s lOd and a counter claim for £29 4s damages in the Magistrates' Court, Levin, before Mr. A. M. Goulding, S.M., on Friday. The hearing lasted more than three hours, two witnesses being called by the plaintiff and one by the defendants. Plaintiff was John Robinson Bibby, contractor, of Shannon, who was represented by Mr,. N. M. Thomson, while defendants were Wiliiam Marks and C'arks' Motors/ of Lower Hutt, for* whom Mr. A. H. Macandrew appeared. Mr. Thomson stated that the case arose out of an accident on Ihe Waikawa Bridge, when two vehicles had collided. He contended that the collision had occurred as a reSult of Marks' vehicle, sa two-ton van, approaching the bridge straddling the white centre line of the road. Plaintiff and James Joseph McFadyen, who had been travelling behind defendant's van, supported this contention, while John Edward Southgate, garage proprietor, of Otaki, gave evidence of the marks left on the road as a result of the accident. Mr. Macandrew held that his client's van had- not been over Ihe -centre line of the road, and both Marks and the driver of the vehicle, Harold Jesse Smith, garage proprietor, of Lower Hutt, gave evidence along these lines. Summing up, Mr. Gouldlug said that the whole quevlon l'or lum tc decide was the reliabiiify of the facts. He accepted unreserved'y the evidence of the witness McFadyen, an independent vitness who had actually seen the acci.l-mt happen. . That and -the evidence of Southgate and Bibby drew attention to the f-act that the van was either right on the centre line of the road or slightly over. He would, therefore, give judgment for plaintiff on both the 'claim and counterciaim, only allowing £93 10s 'lOd of the claim, the remaining part being for the painting of the opposite. side of the car to that damaged. Costs amounting to £9 ls were also qllowp.d.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19490201.2.18

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 1 February 1949, Page 4

Word Count
344

Court Claim Follows Motor Collision Chronicle (Levin), 1 February 1949, Page 4

Court Claim Follows Motor Collision Chronicle (Levin), 1 February 1949, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert