Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DUTCHMAN WHO DECEIVED BEST ART CRITICS

Received Fridav, 7 p.m. LONDON, Oct. 31. The Dutchman who confessed in 1945 that he had deceived some of the leading art experts of the world by painting imitations of tlie works of Vermeer and Pieter de Hoogh and selling them as genuine old masters, was brought to trial in Amsterdam this week. He is the 57 years old Hans van Meegeren, a number of whose works was bought by leading Dutch art galleries and connoisseurs after they had been certi/ied as authentic \ ermeers and de llooghs by

mtemational experts. , Ihe case, which has caused one of the greatest sensations in Slie art world ror many vears, wtis watrhed by critics, painters and connoisseurs from all ovei the world. Van .Meegeren admitted his [ deeeption, stating he had carried it out j "in order to show up the ignorance or | niodern international art experts. ' ' He claimed that he had invented a new process which enabled him exactlv to I imitate the style and .tinish of the old masters even to tlie creation of age cracks on the surface of the paint. A num lier of experts who gave evidence agreed that \ran . Meegeren 's work could be certitie.d as genuine Vermeers and de Hooghs. Tlie pul)lic prosecutor, after admitting tlnit the signatures forged on some of Van Meegeren 's paintings, could not j be distinguished from those of tli^ originals, said either it must be admii

ted that accused was a genius or that the certifications given bv some of the leading art experts were 'dishonest. Before the trial and under close police supervision, Van Meegeren had j painted so good an imitatipn'of a Vermeer that experts had deelared that the forgery was ' ' startling. " J1;-

| van .Vleegeren is alleged to have deI frauded the Dutch Government and a number of private buvers of pver | £500,000 by selling them faked pictures. The Rotterdam Aluseum bought one alleged Vermeer for £55,000. The Court's verdict will be pronounced in a fortnight when it wil also decide whether or not Van Meegeren 's imitations are to be destroyed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19471101.2.30

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 1 November 1947, Page 5

Word Count
349

DUTCHMAN WHO DECEIVED BEST ART CRITICS Chronicle (Levin), 1 November 1947, Page 5

DUTCHMAN WHO DECEIVED BEST ART CRITICS Chronicle (Levin), 1 November 1947, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert