Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORK STULTIFIED

Press Assn.-

^ — Review of Veto Urged AUSTRALIAN OPENS DEBATE

By Telegraph

-Copyright

Received Friday, 11.35 a.m. NEW YORK, Nov. 14. Opening the veto debate in the General Assembly's political committee, Mr. P. Hasluck (Australia) urged a complete review of the veto power. Pointing out that Russia nad invoked the veto ten times, Mr. Hasluck said the plain and ugly i'act was that one pqnnanent meinber claimed he could successfully select at will those resolutions on which he wished to exercise the veto. Its exclusive use stuitified the Security Council's work, undermined confidence in the eouneil and lessened its effectiveness. Mr. Hasluck stressed tha.t Australia was not trying to change the Charter by restricting or eliminating the veto power. Autralia was not attacking great power unanimity, but appeafed to them to come together, thereby achieving in fact that unanimit.y they professedly neld so sacred. The reai issue was "the conduct of the great powers themselves." Mr. Hasluck added: "It is no exaggeration to say that the thought uppermost in the minds of members of the Security Council has not oeen what was the best thing to do, but what can be done without running headlong into another argument about the veto." He proposed, firstly, moderation in using the veto; secondly, increasing consultation and the spirit of give and take among the big powers; and, thirdlv. the development of the Security Council procedure eliminating repeated votes au each stage of its work. Mr. Hasluck moved an Australian resoiution "earnesriy requesting" the permanent members of the i Security Council to refrain from j exercising the veto, except in cases j under chapter seven of the Charter. I The resoiution stated that the | Assembly had considered some I uses, and the threatened use of the ] veto had not been in keeping either ] with the general purposes and prin- I ciples of the Charter, or with the i understanding reached at San Francisco

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19461115.2.27

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 15 November 1946, Page 5

Word Count
320

WORK STULTIFIED Chronicle (Levin), 15 November 1946, Page 5

WORK STULTIFIED Chronicle (Levin), 15 November 1946, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert