Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Tighter benefit checks now

Illegal recipients of social welfare benefits who did not take advantage of last month’s amnesty are now likely to face a greater chance of being caught and prosecuted. In Christchurch, 35 people responded to the Social Welfare Department’s national amnesty on illegally drawn benefits which ended yesterday. From this month, things will be different, according to a spokesman from the department’s benefits and pensions division in Christchurch, Mr A. M. McKenzie.

The department has formed an inquiry unit — a group of 21 officers who will visit beneficiaries’

homes at least every six months.

Mr McKenzie said the aim of the new project was to ensure that beneficiaries were being paid what they were entitled to — no more and no less. There might be some beneficiaries eligible for a particular allowance who were not aware of it, he said.

“Anybody illegally receiving a benefit is now more likely to be found out. Prosecution would probably follow,” said Mr McKenzie.

Anyone in this category who wanted to admit to illegally drawing a benefit would “probably still be treated leniently” if they

visited the department today, Mr McKenzie said. Of the 35 people who responded to the amnesty, 16 had been drawing the domestic purposes benefit, 13 had been drawing the unemployment benefit, and the remainder had been receiving other benefits such as National Superannuation.

These benefits cost almost $3500 each week, Mr McKenzie said. Some of the beneficiaries had been receiving money illegally for more than a year.

Most of the beneficiaries had been either working or living in a de facto relationship while receiving a benefit.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830701.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 1 July 1983, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
269

Tighter benefit checks now Press, 1 July 1983, Page 4

Tighter benefit checks now Press, 1 July 1983, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert