Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Nuclear radiation

Sir,—Mr Hugh Atkinson presents some poorly reasoned arguments in his comments (“The Press,” June 24), but two points cannot be disputed. He suggests that Dr Ber--tell is “talking rubbish in some areas.” True, except that Dr Bertell’s “rubbish” is the pollution and radioactive material which Mr Atkinson seems so unconcerned about. Again, Mr Atkinson says that “New Zealand scientists are not concerned about conditions in the Pacific Islands arising from nuclear testing causing major health problems.” Dr Bertell would agree. It is a little unfortunate however, or has Mr Atkinson forgotten, that New Zealand is also a Pacific island? If we allow such complacency to continue for much longer there will be no clean water left for Mr Atkinson’s contaminated fish to cleanse itself in.—Yours, etc., CHRISTOPHER J. KING. June 24, 1983.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830628.2.97.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 28 June 1983, Page 20

Word count
Tapeke kupu
134

Nuclear radiation Press, 28 June 1983, Page 20

Nuclear radiation Press, 28 June 1983, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert