Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mr Cross defends China ruling

PA Wellington There is no reason why both Chinas should not both compete at the Moscow Olympic Games next year, according to Mr loanee Cross, of Wellington, a member of the executive board of the International Olympic Committee.

At the Olympic Congress meeting in Montevideo last month, a resolution was adopted whereby both the Olympic committee of the People’s Republic of China (Peking) and that of Taiwan would be recognised. “I was accused by one British journalist after that meeting of being a stumbling block to the participation of the People’s Republic at Moscow next year, but that is nonsense,” said Mr Cross yesterday. The allegation was made by John Rodda, writing in the “Guardian” newspaper. “It is now over to Peking to decide whether to accept the 1.0. C. proposition and we should know what its decision is at the next meeting of the executive board to be held in Puerto Rico in June,” Mr Cross said.

Mr Cross moved the amendment at the Montevideo meeting which allowed the possible entry of both Chinas to the Games. It was passed by 38 votes to 28. Mr Cross had earlier headed a three-man 1.0. C. committee which studied the problem of the entry of the two Chinas into the Olympic movement.

“Had not that amendment been carried, the Olympic committee of Taiwan, which has been in existence for the last 30 years, would have been passed over. Already Taiwan has accepted the proposal that its committee will be known as the Chinese Olympic Committee (Taipei),” he said. “Now the People’s Republic has to decide whether its committee will be known as the Chinese Olympic Committee (Peking). We expect that the question will be discussed further in June.

“But far from my admendment’s being a stumbling block to the participation in the Games by the Peking Chinese, it opened the way to participation by both countries,” said Mr Cross.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790421.2.29

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 21 April 1979, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

Mr Cross defends China ruling Press, 21 April 1979, Page 3

Mr Cross defends China ruling Press, 21 April 1979, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert