Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Big drop in cropping farm incomes

The gross incomes of many g r a i n-growing farmers this year would be down between $lO,OOO and $40,000 because of poor harvests, the agriculture executive of North Canterbury Federated Farmers was told by its chairman (Mr K. M. Wells) yesterday. Many areas were again water-logged, he said. It appeared that most of the harvesting had been done, but a large acreage was left to do on heavier land where sowings had been late because of the wet spring. The crop was in very poor condition: heavily sprouted, discoloured, and light on bushel weight, said Mr Wells. It was hard to imagine the value of such a crop, and less than $5O a ton had been offered to some growers.

A survey of the 17 farmers at the meeting yesterday showed an average farm size of 238 ha, and an average gross income loss on this year’s estimated budget of $12,323 because of the poor harvest. The fanners’ 17 farms added up to a total of 4000 ha, and the total loss of income on this year’s estimated budget was $209,500. Mr Wells said many growers had considered an alternative use for grain as stock

feed, but found that because of the high price for store stock, it would be a doubtful enterprise.

The Ministry of Agriculture had said that only 5 to 10 per cent of the crop had still to be harvested in North Canterbury. While this amount looked small, said Mr Wells, it must be remembered that it included many growers with most, and in some cases all, of their harvest.

All grain growers had faced higher cultivation costs than usual to get their crops established, and many had applied nitrogen at considerable expense. Rural Bank loans had been suggested as a means of relief, but they were of little use when the farmers’ debtloads were at a maximum now, said Mr Wells. A higher debt would only aggravate the position, and many could just not afford it. The grain grower had been efficient and economic over recent years, said Mr Wells. Product prices had not moved with costs and inflation, and the industry was now at- such a fine pitch that failures could not be afforded.

The servicing and cartage industries would suffer because of the poor harvests.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790407.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 7 April 1979, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
389

Big drop in cropping farm incomes Press, 7 April 1979, Page 2

Big drop in cropping farm incomes Press, 7 April 1979, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert