Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Stand Case Adjourned

(N.Z. Press Association) i AUCKLAND, June 27. An action brought by the Mount Albert Borough Council against the owner of a “Scotsman’s grandstand” overlooking Eden Park was adjourned by Mr Justice Moller after legal argument over the defendant’s position as a co-owner. The defendant is Monica O’Sullivan, married, of 1 Cricket avenue, Auckland, represented by Mr D. F. Dugdale. The council, represented by Mr P. M. Salmon, sought an injunction against Mrs O'Sullivan. Opening his case, Mr Salmon said the evidence would show the stand was

used commercially. The clause concerning “predominant uses” in the council’s district scheme did not include such a use in a residential area. He submitted that the stand, with an area of 1188 square feet, was larger than Mrs O'Sullivan's house on the same section. The council became concerned during 1962 and 1963 on whether stands on private property abtitting Eden Park were not a contravention of the council’s district scheme. In March, 1963, it declined the application by a firm for a permit to build a stand on a property in the avenue. It had been council policy since not to issue permits for stands in that area. In May, 1963, a stand was built on Mrs O'Sullivan's property. No application was made for a permit. A tubular steel addition was built on September 17, 1965. The stand was used by the

public for the Sprlngboks-All Blacks’ test. Evidence would show that during the 1965 Springboks’ tour seats on the stand were advertised by Mrs O’Sullivan at £2 each. For the defence, Mr Dugdale moved for a non-suit on[ the question of the parties. , “I submit that the action , must be dismissed at this] stage because of the plain-] tiff's failure to join as a defendant one of the two coowners of the property,” he! said. After legal argument and 1 an adjournment his Honour gave an oral judgment containing an order that Mrs [O’Sullivan’s husband, Thomas ] O’Sullivan, be joined as a defendant. | He said the council would have 10 days to file a new statement of claim. His Honour reserved the question of costs and adjourned the matter for a rehearing.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660628.2.29

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31097, 28 June 1966, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

Stand Case Adjourned Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31097, 28 June 1966, Page 3

Stand Case Adjourned Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31097, 28 June 1966, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert