Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Guilty Of Unlawful Entry

A young man who had denied entering a Worcester street boarding-house with intent to steal, and had asked to go on an identification parade, was found guilty by a jury in the Supreme Court yesterday. The accused, Robert Thomas Webster, aged 20, an unemployed workman (Mr L. M. O’Reilly), was remanded by Mr Justice Wilson for sentence on June 24.

The Crown’s case, led by Mr C. M. Roper, was that Webster was a party to an unlawful entry of a room in the boarding-house, from which a £99 television set and a brown rug were stolen. It was alleged that Webster entered through a window, or assisted someone else to do so. The evidence against him, given by Pamela May Cleall, a psychiatric nurse, was that in the mid-afternoon of March 25 he was seen, with two other men, to get out of a car driven into a car park next to the boarding-house, and 10 minutes later return with one man, carrying something under a brown rug.

Miss Cleall said she noticed Webster because she had seen him several times before although, cross-examined, said she did not know where or when.

After first identifying Webster from a number of photographs shown to her by the

police, she picked him out at an identification parade, she said.

Addressing the jury, Mr O’Reilly suggested that Miss Cleall. having admitted there were many possible points of identification on which she "didn’t know,” or "hadn’t taken much notice,” could easily have been mistaken. Yet the whole case had proceeded on the basis that her identification was correct. The jury deliberated for an hour and a quarter before returning a verdict against Webster.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660618.2.240

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31089, 18 June 1966, Page 24

Word count
Tapeke kupu
284

Guilty Of Unlawful Entry Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31089, 18 June 1966, Page 24

Guilty Of Unlawful Entry Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31089, 18 June 1966, Page 24

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert