Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LENGTH OF PARLIAMENT

Present Term Criticised

The Constitutional Society has asked the Government to make provision at the General Election later this year for a referendum on the question of the length of the term of Parliament, giving a choice of three, four or five years. “It has been represented to the society that a term of three years is too short and that it should be extended to four or even five years,” said the president of the society, Sir Matthew Oram, yesterday.

“It is argued that in a three-year term the Ministers of a new Government are preoccupied with becoming acquainted with the workings of their department and are not in a good position to promote legislation,” Sir Matthew Oram said.

“The middle year is, therefore, the only “working’ session because in the third year the parties are concentrating on an approaching election, and that inevitably affects the legislative programme. “Furthermore, the time is too short for the electors to judge the effectiveness of the measures implementing a programme presented to them at the previous election and the parties tend to concentrate on schemes which are likely to be popular rather than on plans for the general good of the country. Practical examples of this have been the ‘stop-and-go economic measures which have caused recurrent crises in i ecent post-election years. "For these reasons, the society supports a longer term of Parliament, which is one of several reforms it considers desirable for the welfare of the country,” Sir Matthew Oram said.

“It is strongly of the opinion, however, that this is an issue on which the electors should be given an opportunity of expressing their views before any action is taken.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660610.2.217

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31082, 10 June 1966, Page 16

Word count
Tapeke kupu
283

LENGTH OF PARLIAMENT Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31082, 10 June 1966, Page 16

LENGTH OF PARLIAMENT Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31082, 10 June 1966, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert