China Policy
Sir, —In answer to Murray A. Williams, each side in the cold war has threatened to destroy the other in certain circumstances of attack. The unleashing of “overkill” stockpiles would mean planetary extinction, so that it is a physical impossibility for either side to dominate the whole world. Professor C. S. Burchill, of Royal Roads College, Canada, wrote: “Tibet has never been recognised by any power as an independent state . . . every international treaty 7 concerning Tibet has recognised that province as an integral part of China there is now general support for the new order in Tibet . . . the charge of genocide is as groundless as is the charge of aggression.” Rather than diplomatic and economic war. including nuclear encirclement of China and possible future massacre, it would be saner and more humane to seek new roads to peaceful co-existence with China Events prove Lenin wrong. The “ripe fruit” is falling like dominoes to the United States. —Yours, etc., L. F. J. ROSS. March 5, 1966.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660308.2.135.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume CV, Issue 31003, 8 March 1966, Page 16
Word count
Tapeke kupu
167China Policy Press, Volume CV, Issue 31003, 8 March 1966, Page 16
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in