Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

B.A.C. l-ll

Sir, —Perhaps “Observer” could tell us why the N.A.C. experts advised the buying of second-hand Friendships from Air Lingus. These, the experts admit, have to be reconditioned before being put into service, and this work will take several months. Air Lingus have replaced with B.A.C. 1-11’s. We do not need a volume such as the experts handed to the Minister, but we have a right to know the story without the eye-wash. “Observer” is certain that Britain will join the E.C.M. Perhaps he was pleased when Ireland obtained free entry into Britain for all her farm produce recently. It could grow into a nice large export business, like the horse-breed-ing did years ago. However, they are satisfied with the BA.C. 1-11 and in one instance, within an hour of its delivery, the machine was on its way to Rome with the Irish delegation to the Ecumenical Council.—Yours, etc,, TRIDENT. February 1, 1966.

Sir, —I see that Mr D. J. Lambert, of B.A.C. says that the. B.A.C. 1-11 is a “RollsRoyce at a Cadillac price.” The other day, while attending the Mangere air pageant, I heard the announcer say that flying a B.A.C. l-11, according to pilots, is like driving a Cadillac. This was re-

peated in local newspapers that evening. It would help the N.A.C. selection committee if it could be clearly stated what sort of car this airliner is supposed to be. Perhaps it is really a replacement for the Model T Ford?—Yours, ONE - DOUBLE - ONE - ELEVEN - ELEVEN. Auckland, February 1, 1966.

Sir, —Your leader on consideration of the B.A.C. 1-11 in relation to our over-all economy was to be commended, notwithstanding the remarks by “Observer” in Tuesday’s columns. To date there has been little adverse criticism of the 1-11 made either of its actual airline operation or of its performance while flying in New Zealand. The early delivery dates offered of a proven aircraft could well cause N.A.C. to reconsider, in the light of their heavily over-committed passenger capacity. The 1-11 could provide the stimulus to tourism in its initial stages of development by offering advanced standards of speed and comfort, with Air New Zealand, our rapidly expanding overseas airline. At the same time the purchase of a British aircraft would ensure a smooth passage for our trade agreements, due for renewal. Yours, etc,, COMMON (WEALTH) MARKET. February 1, 1966.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660203.2.112.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 30975, 3 February 1966, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
394

B.A.C. l-ll Press, Volume CV, Issue 30975, 3 February 1966, Page 12

B.A.C. l-ll Press, Volume CV, Issue 30975, 3 February 1966, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert