Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISARMAMENT.

DOMINION FLEETS.

AUSTRALIAN REDUCTION. (UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION—B7 ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH— COPISIGHT.) (Received May 11th, 10.20 p.m.) LONDON, May 11. The Naval correspondent of the "Morning Post," commenting on the serious reductions in the . Australian Navy points out that the Australian Fleet, which is considerable on paper is reckoned as part of the Boyal Navy at recurring Disarmament Conferences so the falling out of commission of many units, the latest being the aircraft carrier, Albatross, ia a matter whieU deserves attention. The correspondent adds New Zealand is generously training reserve officers in addition to its valuable contribution in ciuisers. navy limitation. GREAT BRITAIN'S POLICY. (BRITISH OFFICIAL WIRELXSS.I RUGBY, May 10. Reference to the negotiations for a naval building agreement were made last evening, in a speech at Sheffield, by the First Lord pf the Admiralty, Mr A. V. Alexander, who said that he and the Foreign Secretary, Mr A. Henderson, had made great efforts to get adhesion to Part 3 of the Naval Treaty (the agreement between Great' Britain, the United States, and Japan for the limitation of cruisers, destroyers, and submarines) by France and Italy. They came hack from Paris with the. understanding that the agreement was complete, and that there was no question "about it. It was not wise, perhaps, for anyone who had to take part in international negotiations at this stage to apportion blame. Mr Alexander continued: "We made the greatest possible concessions we could, and we from Paris on March Ist with the agreement. which I afterward submitted to the House of Commons on March 12tn, in which there is to me no ambiguity. - "In France to-day questions have been raised at a somewhat late date. I want to say there will be no efforts lacking on our part to promote that spirit of goodwill essential tp secure progress in this direction. "But I also want to say that there is going to be np guarantee of success in progress toward disarmament merely by one country always giving way. -

"If you are going to get a disarmament which ig going to be a real aifi t'O peace it rnust be disarmament of all. and not of one, and all the nations concerned must make equal contributions to the effort."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19310512.2.67

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20234, 12 May 1931, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
373

DISARMAMENT. Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20234, 12 May 1931, Page 9

DISARMAMENT. Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20234, 12 May 1931, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert