COUNTY RATES.
—". PLEA FOR 25 PER CENT- | REDUCTION. TOWNSPEOPLE AND THE * ROADS* . t ■ f j T" ! . ; -(Si4ctA£'"*o tUB fassS-} L , • . INVEROARGILL, February 2L A discussion on the necessity for, a substantial 1 redaction in county 'rates at a meeting of the Southland Executive of the Farmers'.. Union to-day brought out the statement that if the counties all Wed their wads to get into bad repair it would havb a strong moral dfect on\the townspeppl?, who fdfiiSe to acknowledge that M the farmers are facing an- eoM4iiiio iSriSii). "If the townspeople, who go ,out into the,c6Unt#y, ie? a joyride to be tosSed nboUt k hit On tljfli toadi It mighty make thorn. think and .WakS 'them up; to position Ui t " Mffiadted inember responsible for jfcbe Another member sa|d he diA not' think,' that method of reprisals was so Bonnd, as the townspeople weye not compellea to use the goSiiw ana ir WW farmers who would be t&sied ahont.", The meeting passed a MiwlUtion, vocAl ting a rigid curtailment- of iflwJ rf"; uf t """ s ' fattiiori a t&A, ' Mr .o. !E. Neidsrer,' piflVincial organiser for' ths siiaiiithat thefarmers expefitdd thai the, tinlon would give a lead ..-in the mattfif 1 of urgijig a reduction of farmers, he added, field very extreme views. He had he&ird' oU farmer SeHoUSly sttg. gest "thatthe , coUfiij' - should disiUHa'ftli thdif eriipldyees, levyho i'atfis for thp and alWw th 6 to do what it could with the roads with,the Highways Board funds, , This view Jwks certainly, but the Union should tion in tates.' , , The chairman, as a member, of 1 the Southland County Council, sstid' that he did bdl know. Whether thfe ehaitmM tof ; th 6' Wallace Couhty Ceuneil (also.* a member of the executive) was pyepayed to discuss* the policy of his'Oojinoiij hut ' as far' as the Southland .County Cotia-/ cii waa .concerned he boild say that it •was not undertaking njt present any development wojk,'-and expenditure was kept down -to an minimum. Speaking personally, however, he. must say ,thAt he would" neve* 1 consent j to the roads in his ndiftg being allowed 'to deteriorate, * 1 In reply td a the chairman said' that, the costs were low, and' in some instances very low. , Mr .T, Major stressed the necessity for the tTnion taking a lead and said * that in his thd Union was quite jUßtiiied in making a recommendation to the County couti&ls that tfo tates be reduced" to the .greatest eitent possible in view of. the present econo&ic situation, ,At its pfeViQU* mgetittg the Executive urged that-the of -the 10 per cent,- penalty on' unpaid rates should' not be imposed Until at least two-months later in view, of the financial position. Replies from the County, Council and the Powe*. Board ware redeivfd-to-day ' stating _th4t the would not bd charged until the last possible day, but it Was-nweSß&ry : thftt the- rate 'should be added',, if tw local* bodies "Were to > .receive their xevenueL /
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19310223.2.65
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20169, 23 February 1931, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
489COUNTY RATES. Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20169, 23 February 1931, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in