Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

URANIUM DEPOSITS

BELGIAN CONGO ALLEGED DEAL The uranium deposits in the Belgian Congo, 900,000 square mile territory in the heart of Africa, have suddenly become front-page news. Brussels is seething with various rumours about an alleged uranium deal concluded during the war between the United States and Belgium. Under it Belgium is supposed to have ceded the whole output of uranium in the Congo to the United States.

It is said that only three or four people in Belgium, including the Foreign Minister, M. Spaak, know the actual details of the arrangement by which the Americans have acquired a virtual monopoly on the term of the agreement. What is certain is that even Belgian scientists are not allowed to travel to the colonies, and that Belgian scientific institutions have not been able to get an ounce of uranium from the Congo since the war, although the Congo’s uranium deposits are estimated by some authorties at 70 per cent, of the known world resources.

“Iron Curtain”

The matter has now been taken up by the Belgian Royalists, some of whose spokesmen have been asking what is happening to the Congo uranium. A Royalist paper the other day asserted that even Belgian Parliajnentary commissions have been denied entry into the Congo and demanded a public Parliamentary inquiry into what is called the “iron curtain” between the Motherland and the Colonies.

The issue had previously been raised by the Communists, but some Royalists now seem determined to steal their atomic thunder and turn it on the Government. The Rightwing opposition, however, is divided on the question. One section of it is loath to use the atomic argument as a means of hastening the King’s return, because it is afraid that by so doing it may expose itself to the accusation of playing the Russian game.

Another section of the Royalists would sacrifice considerations of foreign policy to its Royalist zeal; and it threatens to stage a modern Belgian version of the Panama scandal, a scandal which may have repercussions far beyond the frontiers of Belgium.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19470203.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 89, 3 February 1947, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
342

URANIUM DEPOSITS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 89, 3 February 1947, Page 5

URANIUM DEPOSITS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 89, 3 February 1947, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert