Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARMERS PLEBISCITE

MISREPRESENTATION ALLEGED

MR R. W. DUNNING’S STATEMENT

The following' statement to the press has been made by Mr R. W. Dunning - , Sub-Provincial President Federated Farmers (Auckland Province) in connection with the recent reports anent the plebiscite conducted throughout the Bay of Plenty and the subsequent meetings of Federated Farmers.

I wish to correct some of Mr Parkers statements made to the Press of the Bay just recently. Much of it is terribly misleading through a misuse of words. Neither Mr Robinson nor Mr Wills could say that the voting was carried out to the satisfaction of both parties (meaning organisations) nor did they, except insofar as their duties as scrutineers in the office. The minutes of Wellington Conference as published by Mr Parker were also misleading, as words were added that should not have been there. The reference to the Waikato is also misleading, as that question is very far from settled. Ido know that many hundreds of farmers wish to stay within the Auckland group. I do not say that Mr Parker wilfully tried to mislead anybody, but unfortunately his way of putting it will do so. Mr Parker should not try to force the issue as he has. The question is still sub judicae, and will be handled by the Wellington Council on the 25th or 28th of February.

Why did Wellington at the last Auckland Conference admit Auckland as a province allow it to be registered as such, and then immediately proceed to try to cut it up. I do know that many of Auckland’s members did not vote because they had so often stated that they were going to stay with Auckland as part of the Dominion organisation, and did not see any sense in setting up an expensive local group. That they thought was enough. Unity is strength, then why split ourselves up into smaller and smaller groups? We must unite, but in the right way and for the right things. It is a fact that those who are sponsoring this local move have never taken.part in the farmers organisations nor have they at any time tried to make contact with either myself or my executive. Every approach has been made by us. Signed, R. W. DUNNING.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19470122.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 76, 22 January 1947, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

FARMERS PLEBISCITE Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 76, 22 January 1947, Page 5

FARMERS PLEBISCITE Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 76, 22 January 1947, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert