Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REHAB. LOANS

SALES TAX ABOLITION POSITION NOT AFFECTED The effect which the abolition og sales tax on building materials might have on rehabilitation building loans is discussed in a statement from the Rehabilitation Board. The statement says there appears to be some misunderstanding current in certain quarters regarding the position, particularly as regards the loan limit of £ISOO.

It had even been suggested that as a result of the sales tax abolition the loan limit had been correspondingly reduced. This was entirely .untrue, the limit having been by no means changed, although certain adjustments had had to be. made in cases where the reduction of sales tax from the contract price had made a substantial difference in the price eventually to be found. In such cases the amount to be paid by the ex-serviceman, and consequently the amount advanced by the Board, would be reduced by the amount of the sales tax no longer payable. This could hardly be termed a reduction in the loan limit. Where it was necessary to advance up to £ISOO to complete a transaction, this would still be done. A somewhat similar position sometimes arose in the. purchase of exservicemen with rehabilitation loans of existing dwellings. The applicant when asked how much he was prepared to put into the proposition might say, for instance, £2OO. The price asked by the vendor might be £I7OO, which meant that the Board would be prepared to advance £ISOO. However, the Land Sales Committee might reduce the vendor’s price to £I6OO. The only altered circumstance £IOO. Therefore assuming that the would be a reduction in price by applicant was still in a position to provide his original £2OO, the Board’s advance would be reduced to £I4OO. The result would be a lesser indebtedness for the applicant, which would be very much to his eventual benefit.

In neither -case, whether the loan was to build or to purchase, was there any suggestion that the limit of £ISOO obtainable had been reduced. In the circumstances mentioned the granting of a loan to the maximum of £ISOO was merely unnecessary.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19461007.2.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 34, 7 October 1946, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

REHAB. LOANS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 34, 7 October 1946, Page 6

REHAB. LOANS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 34, 7 October 1946, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert