Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXORBITANT COST

PROTECTIVE WALL AT HEADS ESTIMATE OF £45,000 In response to considerable local comment that the Harbour Board should do something towards protecting the harbour mouth from continual silting up, the Board recently instructed its engineer (Mr C. H. Brebner) to go into the question of approximate estimates for carrying out such work. The report on this connection was before the Board at its meeting on Friday last and read as under:—

The Board requested that a walkover estimate of the cost be prepared for closing the Western Channel by groyne and confining the channel therefrom by groyne to the river mouth, and groyning the sandspit on the landward side as more particularly set out in original plans. By the term “groyne” I presume the Board meant a “retaining” or “sea wall” and I have based my estimate upon the latter as “groynes” could not be used for that purpose. Messrs. Blair, Mason, Lee and Brown prepared a report many years ago on the same project but I am unable to trace such report or the estimated cost of the work at that time.

A walk-over estimate is necesarily an approximation only and should be strictly regarded as such. A firm estimate would be based on careful field work including foundation soundings etc. The length of wall required would be not less than 2000 lin. feet, would have to be of rugged construction to stand heavy seas and river floods. The stone used would have to be of good quality and of large dimensions. The wall would be built on a sand foundation where considerable scour would take place. Provision would have to be made for this in designing the wall. The walkover estimate is as follows: — 30,000 tons of stone in situ at 30/per ton £45,000.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19460805.2.29

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 7, 5 August 1946, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
298

EXORBITANT COST Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 7, 5 August 1946, Page 5

EXORBITANT COST Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 10, Issue 7, 5 August 1946, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert